[Ci4cg-announce] The Last Op-Ed

Fri Jun 21 17:11:19 PDT 2019

We haven't seen much action on this list lately so I thought I'd send the
op-ed that I just wrote. Warning: it's not academic. :-)    I've sent it to
a progressive web site but haven't heard back. But — if any of you have
suggestions for some outlet that is looking for the last op-ed, let me
know. At any rate, happy longest day of the year —for those above the
equator, that is. And shortest day for those below. May your days get
longer.

Thanks and good luck to all of us!

— Doug

The Last Op-Ed
We Are Destroying The One Thing That Could Save Us

Douglas Schuler

Many religious fundamentalists agree: the world is coming to an end!

Some (most?) think it will end in fire. The others think that ice will be
the culprit.

After contemplating the smoke-filled skies we're expecting this summer, I'm
with the flamers.

Seriously folks, we're screwed. Pandemics. Water wars. Children in cages.
Junk culture. Biblical floods. Extinction.

The dangerous, exploitive, and unpredictable world that we've created is
headed for oblivion.

Technology won't save us. Nor clever mantras, MAGA hats, driverless
vehicles, or moving to the off-world colonies. We won't be rescued by the
marines, billionaires, or digitally rendered superheroes. Not even the last
lucky rabbit's foot on earth can help.

We are destroying our most vital resource.

Without civic intelligence, our capacity to address problems effectively
and equitably, we have no future.

Nobody cares. Probably because caring would mean altering how we'll think
and act.

People have bemoaned its decline and publicized its importance, but without
a commonly accepted expression, we can't think or talk about it.

John Dewey's "pooled intelligence" is built with the contributions of
everybody: We won't make progress fighting racism, economic inequality,
environmental degradation, or war without our collective creativity,
compassion, and dedication.

Civic intelligence is broad but not ambiguous. Social change is a learning
process that adapts to specific situations. Groups of people work both
independently and cooperatively: protesting, theorizing, teaching and
learning, gardening, building, writing checks, programming, analyzing data,
and making music and art.

Civic intelligence is easier to destroy than to create. Countries that
recently launched democratic reforms are backsliding into fascism. Sadly
this makes sense: Any fool can burn a barn down.

On the other hand, David, the shepherd of biblical fame, successfully
deployed his slingshot against the giant Goliath. In other words: David
sometimes wins. And not because of luck.

One practices civic intelligence with thought and action, never one without
the other. It's directed towards positive social and environmental ends.
It's critical, non-dogmatic and provisional.

Civic intelligence requires citizen engagement. One can begin by reading
and discussing. Join existing projects, groups, or movements or start
something new. Ask questions: Why is this community impoverished? Can
health care be more affordable? How can environmental and social aims be
tackled simultaneously?

Civic intelligence presumes that paths exist that lead to improved
situations even if the paths aren't obvious. It may be difficult to see how
an action addresses the problem, but actions help uncover new ideas and
opportunities.

It doesn't demonize groups of people or promote violence. Dubious slogans
around "purity" or past "greatness" divert attention from real issues and
promote civic ignorance.

Civic intelligence doesn't require permission or a degree. Greta Thunberg,
the 16-year-old Swedish activist, proved that age isn't a barrier. She
showed that the appointed stewards are destroying the future of the
vulnerable people they're supposed to protect.

Civic intelligence isn't new. Before 1874 it was illegal to beat your dog
but legal to beat your child. But after a chilling episode, the issue of
child welfare was thrust into the public sphere and the first laws against
cruelty to children were passed.

And genocide wasn't a crime until a Polish lawyer, Raphael Lemkin, coined
the term and pushed the UN in 1948 to adopt laws against it.

When the media focuses on dynamic leaders and dramatic actions it ignores
the daily work, the crucial submerged part of the civic intelligence
iceberg, that remains unseen and under appreciated. Civically intelligent
actions emerge from everyday life.

Citizens march for science and for women. They design tiny houses for
homeless people and read the Mueller Report to learn about irregularities
in the 2016 presidential campaign. Senior citizens in the Netherlands get
together and repair discarded appliances. Kenyans planted 51 million trees
to help reforest their country. People worldwide conduct citizen science,
counting nests, testing water for toxins, monitoring factories.

Governments can also engage. In 2015 nearly all of the world's countries
agreed on a plan to address climate change. And when a climate change
denier in the White House dispersed many of the country's most
knowledgeable policy-makers, they landed in state and local governments,
foundations, and non-profits, reconfiguring their network to continue the
work.

Many of us tell ourselves that solving the world's problems isn't our
business. This means passing these problems on to leaders that few believe
should be trusted.

Civically ignorant people can't change their minds, ask critical questions,
see other perspectives, confront ambiguity, question their premises, or be
skeptical of dubious claims. They blame the victim and fear the person who
doesn't look, act, or think like they do. They choose "strong men" to lead
them, wannabe dictators who promise to solve all their problems, usually by
"getting tough" through brutality and marginalization of others. Civic
ignorance begets civic ignorance.

People are rightly concerned with their own lives and are caught up in
habits of thinking that prevent meaningful action. They've been taught not
to think about or question certain things, that they are powerless and
things are hopeless. They're anxious, depressed and paralyzed.

But while civic intelligence is often perilously low it's never zero. And
there's no maximum: there can always be more.

Positive strides have been made throughout history even in the bleakest
times and not all actions are destined for failure. Civic intelligence
requires courage. The struggles will often be protracted and will be met
with strong well-resourced opposition.

Anyone can play an active role in our dynamic and evolving civic
intelligence. People will see the signs of hope if they look for them. One
of my most memorable moments as a teacher was when a student told me her
mother was also learning about civic intelligence. Happily they were
discussing these ideas after class.

We don't have to kill ourselves. A just and sustainable world is possible.
But we may choose to fiddle while the world burns. If, indeed, it's not ice
that closes the curtains on the final performance
-- 
Douglas Schuler
douglas at publicsphereproject.org
Twitter: @doug_schuler

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Public Sphere Project
     http://www.publicsphereproject.org/

Mailing list ~ Collective Intelligence for the Common Good
     * http://scn9.scn.org/mailman/listinfo/ci
<http://scn9.scn.org/mailman/listinfo/ci>4cg-announce*

Creating the World Citizen Parliament

http://interactions.acm.org/archive/view/may-june-2013/creating-the-world-citizen-parliament

Liberating Voices!  A Pattern Language for Communication Revolution
(project)
     http://www.publicsphereproject.org/patterns/lv
<http://www.publicsphereproject.org/patterns/>

Liberating Voices!  A Pattern Language for Communication Revolution (book)

 http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?ttype=2&tid=11601
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.scn.org/private/ci4cg-announce/attachments/20190621/1ffe7351/attachment.html>