From comnets at u.washington.edu Mon Apr 8 16:58:31 1996 From: comnets at u.washington.edu (Douglas Schuler) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 96 16:58:31 -0700 Subject: Mr. Rheingold's Neighborhood Message-ID: <9604082358.AA06119@saul6.u.washington.edu> For those who might be interested, Howard Rheingold (of "Virtual Community" fame) recently interviewed me about my book for the on-line journal Salon. The URL for the interview is http://www.salon1999.com/11/departments/rheingold.html -- Doug * * * * * * * * * * * * * * From the Listowner * * * * * * * * * * * * . To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to: majordomo at scn.org In the body of the message, type: unsubscribe scn END From comnets at u.washington.edu Wed Apr 10 15:06:33 1996 From: comnets at u.washington.edu (Douglas Schuler) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 96 15:06:33 -0700 Subject: DIAC-97 Planning Message-ID: <9604102206.AA02810@saul6> To: computer activists, community computing types, technology critics, interested citizens, social service providers, etc. What: DIAC-97 Planning Meeting When: 7:00 PM, Thursday, April 11, 1996 Where: 911 Media Arts, 117 Yale, Seattle (682-6552) Although many of you were too young to remember... :-) CPSR/Seattle convened a very succesful conference in 1987 called the DIAC-87 symposium, where "DIAC" = the "Directions and Implications of Advanced Computing." At DIAC-87 several issues were discussed and SDI was an important topic. After the first one in Seattle, CPSR has gone on to sponsor DIACs in Minneapolis, Berkeley, and two in Boston. Now - approximately 10 years later we're returning to Seattle with DIAC-97 scheduled for the happy month of February. Although the title has not been chosen, the general theme will be how computers have changed and could change community life. We will be looking at it from many sides and the word "community" is to be construed broadly. This did not start out as a CPSR conference - it was proposed by two people who are still very involved but are happy to see CPSR get involved as well. In fact one thing that we want to do is to get as many different organizations involved as possible. We will be looking for a wide number of co-sponsoring organizations and we are also looking for individuals and groups to convene a large (20 - 50) number of educational and thought provoking workshops that attendees can enjoy. (Please begin thinking of what you'd like to propose for workshops!) Anyway, this note is longer than I had expected it to be, so I'll give my fingers a rest. I'm hoping that some of you can show up on Thursday evening and that you'll help make DIAC-97 the best DIAC ever!! Thanks! -- Doug * * * * * * * * * * * * * * From the Listowner * * * * * * * * * * * * . To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to: majordomo at scn.org In the body of the message, type: unsubscribe scn END From carlos at scn.org Tue Apr 16 14:30:26 1996 From: carlos at scn.org (Carlos Cruz) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 1996 14:30:26 -0700 (PDT) Subject: KCTS Phone-A-Thon! Message-ID: This is a general request for volunteers for one of our past benefactors of SCN. On 09 May 1996 The Washington Talking Book and Braille Library is providing support for the KCTS channel 9 phone-a-thon at there main studio location at 401 Mercer Street, Seattle. Volunteers are needed to answer phones from 6:30-11:00pm. Food and drink will be provided. KCTS 9 as you know is an SCN partner as well as lending radio carrier support to the library. If you are interested please contact John Lyle at the Washington TBBL: telephone # 464-6930. Thank you in advance. Carlos * * * * * * * * * * * * * * From the Listowner * * * * * * * * * * * * . To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to: majordomo at scn.org In the body of the message, type: unsubscribe scn END From lbs at aa.net Wed Apr 17 06:09:36 1996 From: lbs at aa.net (Lucys) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 1996 06:09:36 -0700 (PDT) Subject: FCC Universal Service Filing Supports Public Access (fwd) Message-ID: FYI: thought this was interesting...regarding community networks. -- Lucy S. lbs at aa.net Seattle, Washington USA ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 15 Apr 1996 15:43:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Phil Agre To: rre at weber.ucsd.edu Subject: FCC Universal Service Filing Supports Public Access =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= This message was forwarded through the Red Rock Eater News Service (RRE). Send any replies to the original author, listed in the From: field below. You are welcome to send the message along to others but please do not use the "redirect" command. For information on RRE, including instructions for (un)subscribing, send an empty message to rre-help at weber.ucsd.edu =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Date: Mon, 15 Apr 1996 17:35:58 -0500 From: rciville at civicnet.org (Richard R. Civille) Subject: FCC Universal Service Filing Supports Public Access -- ANNOUNCEMENT -- April 15, 1996 FCC Universal Service Filing Supports Public Access Last Friday, April 12th, the Center for Civic Networking (CCN) and the Graduate School of Library and Information Science (GLIS) at the University of Illinois Champaigne/Urbana filed comments to the FCC Joint Board on Universal Service. The comments are of interest to community networks, public access cable and community computer centers, schools, libraries, community development corporations, state telecommunication policy analysts and others. The filing outlines a set of universal service recommendations and described data analyses that could support them. The Board was urged to develop Universal Service policy that promotes a leveling effect between information haves and have-nots while stimulating new sectors in the economy such as microenterprises and home-based businesses. At the same time this framework is explored, the Board is asked to carefully examine results of analyses that illustrate the characteristics of affected population groups. The Center's Richard Civille said: "The Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service has been tasked with a solemn responsibility. Its recommendations will influence decisions that will affect the new economy and individual quality of life in the United States for decades to come." Dr. Ann Bishop, Assistant Professor at the Graduate School < abishop at uiuc.edu> said: "We strongly urge the Board to seek out and examine data that will illuminate how their recommendations may impact economic opportunity and quality of life not only on disenfranchised groups, but on emerging economic sectors." Bishop is a co-founder of Prarie-Net, a well established community network project serving over 15,000 in southern Illinois. Civille is a co-founder of CapAccess, a community network in the National Capital area serving over 12,000. The filing outlines a Universal Service framework that provides: * Market incentives and individual tax credits to increase computer ownership among low-income households and microenterprises; * Electronic mail services for low-income children and job-seekers; * Development of public access network services that offer useful and beneficial information products and services that address community needs and civic life; * Mechanisms to finance network literacy programs through adult education programs, public libraries, and schools; * Improved Federal data collection on the individual use of networked information. These recommendations are based on "The Internet and the Poor", written by CCN's Richard Civille and published in "Public Access to the Internet" edited by Brian Kahin, MIT Press, 1995. The Center for Civic Networking and the Graduate School of Library and Information Science at the University of Illinois, Champaign/Urbana have undertaken a joint project to submit a set of white papers to the Board, based upon Census Current Population Survey (CPS) data that describe emerging groups of information haves and have nots, policy implications of the data and options for decisionmakers to consider. The joint project will analyze Census data on demographic groups such as: * Home-based businesses and microenterprises; * Discouraged workers; * Disabled individuals; * Family farms; * Group households; and * Single mothers on public assistance. These groups will be examined from national samples over a several year period, and then broken down into geographic regions, income quintiles, ethnic background and individual interests such as civic participation. Civille said: "We hope that in the coming months, the Board will consider the demographic characteristics described in these white papers and by similar studies we hope will be submitted by other organizations." ------------------ * --------------------- * ------------------ To receive a copy of the filing or a copy of The Internet and the Poor, please respond privately to this email message. The materials will be available on the CCN web-site in several days, at HTTP://civic.net. The filing is available either in MS-Word binhex format or text. "The Internet and the Poor" is available in MS-Word binhex format *only*. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Richard Civille Center for Civic Networking Executive Director P.O. 53152 (202) 362-3831 Washington, DC 20009 rciville at civicnet.org http://civic.net/ccn.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * * * * * * * * * * From the Listowner * * * * * * * * * * * * . To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to: majordomo at scn.org In the body of the message, type: unsubscribe scn END From rclark at aa.net Fri Apr 19 12:25:55 1996 From: rclark at aa.net (Rod Clark) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 1996 12:25:55 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Our new SCN Web site is now live Message-ID: The new SCN Web site, that so many of you have been shaping with your suggestions and good ideas for the past couple of months, is now on line. Its purpose is to let everyone find things more easily on SCN. We still have many areas to update, so please let us know what you'd like to see, as you look around the new menus. Please report any teething troubles to webmasters at scn.org. If you'd like to help with our continuing effort to do a spring cleaning on all the accumulated, innumerable multifarious former menus and outdated information that's been created but not always kept current over the past few years, please feel free to join the webmasters discussion list, and pitch in. Our goal is that every area of SCN will offer current, updated information by sometime this summer. We'd like to encourage more people to join SCN, to volunteer, to provide information, and to participate in all of our Seattle communities, and we hope that the Web site can convey some of that as we go along. Thanks, Rod Clark * * * * * * * * * * * * * * From the Listowner * * * * * * * * * * * * . To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to: majordomo at scn.org In the body of the message, type: unsubscribe scn END From carlos at scn.org Sat Apr 27 00:01:49 1996 From: carlos at scn.org (Carlos Cruz) Date: Sat, 27 Apr 1996 00:01:49 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Read Me (fwd) Message-ID: ---------- Forwarded message ---------- On February 20, 1996, the Salt Lake City School Board voted to ban all clubs in order to keep a Gay/Lesbian/Straight Alliance from forming at East High School. Despite numerous phone calls and countless letters, the board seems to remain recalcitrant. Salt Lake City will host the 2002 Winter Olympics with the slogan "The World is Welcome Here." The Salt Lake City School Board's decision calls into question how much of the "World" is truly "Welcome" here. The Citizens' Alliance for Hate Free Schhols, a project of the Utah Human Rights Coalition, calls on all supporters of the rights of young people to have equal access to educational opportunities and safe schools to sign the following petition. PLEASE SIGN THE PETITION AND THEN FORWARD TO SOMEONE ELSE. IF YOU ARE A TENTH PERSON TO SIGN YOUR NAME, FORWARD THE LIST BACK TO ME: cdorchard at earthlink.net (i.e. the 10th, 20th, 30th person will forward this message to me in progress) I will compile the petition and send it to the board members. Target Deadline: June 4, 1996 PETITION TO THE SALT LAKE CITY SCHOOL BOARD "We, the undersigned, support the efforts by area high school students to organize non-curricular clubs and alliances designed to increase understanding and good will among the high school population and the general public as well. We call on the Salt Lake City School Board to resist all illegal attempts at intimidation and coercion to deprive students of their legally guaranteed rights. We request that they take immediate action to reverse their decision on February 20, 1996, to ban all clubs." # Name E-Mail Address Place of Residence (Not Obligatory) ========================================================================== 1. Alison Streit Washington, DC 2. Christine Allison Santa Barbara, CA 3. Larry McLellan Santa Barbara, CA 4. Christopher Putney Chapel Hill, NC 5. Stanley Burgoyne Chapel Hill, NC 6. David Shengold South Hadley, MA 7. Sheree Morgan smorgan at mtholyoke.edu Northampton MA 8. Chandra Ford State College, PA 9. Christy L. Ventura University Park, PA 10. Chandreyee Das University Park, PA 11. Andrew Miller aem125 at psu.edu University Park, PA 12. David Scrymgeour das251 at psu.edu University Park, PA 13. Stephanie Evans Salt Lake City, UT 14. Ena Ladi ena.ladi at u.cc.utah.edu Centerville, UT 15. Emily Moss emoss at emory.edu Atlanta, GA 16. Grace Shih gshih01 at emory.edu Atlanta, GA 17. Alex Wang ywang02 at emory.edu Atlanta, GA 18. Jennifer Genung jgenung at emory.edu Atlanta, GA 19. Stephanie Wolfe swolfe at emory.edu Atlanta, GA 20. Lee S. Szolusha nitehawk at earthlink.net Lodi,NJ 21. Louis A. Perosi lamp970 at aol.com West Paterson, NJ 22. Leslie GrantSmith looscann at aol.com San Diego, CA. 23. Marcia Smith smithy at scn.org Seattle, WA 24. Nancy Kunitsugu Seattle, WA 25. Carlos Cruz ccruz at scn.org Seattle, WA send petition to Charlene Orchard if you are #10, 20, 30, etc. Charlene Orchard Co-Chair, Utah Human Rights Coalition P.O. Box 521242 Salt Lake City, UT 84152-1242 801-484-5291 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * From the Listowner * * * * * * * * * * * * . To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to: majordomo at scn.org In the body of the message, type: unsubscribe scn END From lbs at aa.net Mon Apr 29 22:01:29 1996 From: lbs at aa.net (Lucys) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 1996 22:01:29 -0700 (PDT) Subject: NII: The Dark Side in Washington State (fwd) Message-ID: FYI: interesting article. -- Lucy S. lbs at aa.net Seattle, Washington USA ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Sun, 28 Apr 1996 19:02:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Phil Agre To: rre at weber.ucsd.edu Subject: NII: The Dark Side in Washington State [Gordon Cook's report on the NII in Washington State is, so far as I am aware, the only study of the full range of privacy-invasive technologies in a specific region. I have enclosed, with permission, the introduction to this report. The report's table of contents, along with information on ordering and the like, is available at the URL listed below. Gordon's "Cook Report on Internet-NREN" is just about the best independent voice on emerging directions of the Internet architecture and related topics.] =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= This message was forwarded through the Red Rock Eater News Service (RRE). Send any replies to the original author, listed in the From: field below. You are welcome to send the message along to others but please do not use the "redirect" command. For information on RRE, including instructions for (un)subscribing, send an empty message to rre-help at weber.ucsd.edu =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= [http://pobox.com/cook/washington.html] The Cook Report on Internet-NREN NII: The Dark Side in Washington State Introduction and Summary This report is the result of two weeks of interviews in Washington State in late May and early June. It shows a very dark picture of our coming technology "dystopia." The COOK Report finds that the state of Washington leads the rest of the nation in developing the building blocks of a statewide information infrastructure. What is being "leveraged" there is the Clinton -- Gore push for National Information Infrastructure (NII). NII is touted in commercials by AT&T and others as being kind of warm and friendly communications utopia. But the essence of NII is often in the eye of the beholder. In fact, there is no widely accepted definition of or goals for NII. Instead, it is one of those terms with a definition specific to whomever is talking about it at any given moment. In the state of Washington what is being constructed is not a service for video on demand; nor is it home shopping. It is a statewide web of state agency networks and inter linked databases. While other states have some NII related projects, we are not aware of any that have the number and scope of those in Washington. People with whom we talked generally agreed that the citizens of Washington are facing a situation where their privacy is fast disappearing and where the rights to information that they own and should effectively control are being sold out from under them. In the opinion of many to whom we talked, the situation is volatile and may become more so. Even George Lindamood, the outgoing Director of the Department of Information Services, acknowledged that when the citizens of the state understand the totality of what had happened to them, they will be angry. In order to bring a "competitive environment" to the citizens of the state, Washington State agencies are moving forward to implement new information technology programs. But this information technology is the new hucksterism of the second half of the '90s. With the Clinton Administration pushing it in the first half of the decade, officials from the various departments of state government are lined up at the federal table to make sure they get the technology grants that will make their agencies stand out at home. They are very likely perfectly well-intentioned civil servants - in a hurry to build now and ask questions later. Policy issues, the big picture, privacy and confidentiality concerns are given lip service, but usually put off as being to difficult to deal with now. As these are put off, the web of interconnected communications systems and databases grows and wraps more firmly in place around Washington State residents. There may be about a year to make meaningful changes before the average citizen is irretrievably caught in the emerging state data web. The only hope that we see is for citizen groups to coalesce, get educated and agree on the objectives for and definition of a state commission on citizen information rights -- one that has legal power to slow down the technocratic juggernaught -- until adequate legal safeguards to protect privacy can be put in place. The citizen's lobby must then sell these objectives to the legislature. If they don't succeed, Washington State may be neither comfortable nor a good place in which to live. It will be a combination of "Brave New World," "Blade Runner" and a digital Singapore transplanted to the Pacific northwest by a seemingly well-intentioned alliance between corporate and political technocratic elites. One agency that is part of this Washington State web has a database of at-risk four-year-olds that can be linked with databases of violent juveniles, drug use incidence, trade and economic activity. All this information can be mapped matched with census tract and other economic data through a Geographic Information System (GIS). A GIS Database allows many different kinds of information to be overlaid on maps of differing scales according to physical location. GIS was described to us by the Assistant Director of Administrative Services of Community, Trade and Economic Development (CTED), a relatively new state agency, as "the glue that holds all the other disparate information together". The CTED system is under construction. Someone has obviously decided there is a public purpose to be served in creating a database of at-risk four-year- olds and another of violent offenders. Missing from the Washington State scene is any widespread public understanding either that these and other data bases exist. Also absent is any reasonable means of challenge by the public to state agency use of them. For example, what if CTED were to decide that when a business had narrowed its choice to four potential locations, the final step towards maximum competitiveness for that business would be to show it the population density of at-risk four-year-olds and violent offenders in each of the sites? The business would surely choose to locate in an area with as few undesirables as possible. The potential of information technology to be used in building economic ghettos in Washington State is not generally known let alone an item on the public policy agenda. This report describes the all ensnaring data web that is being woven in Washington State. Since many of the programs being field tested in Washington are federally backed, what happens there is likely to spread to other states unless we understand what is happening and insist that it be stopped. The spinning of the data web begins in kindergarten -- or even earlier -- when parents are asked to supply their children's Social Security Numbers as identifiers. Goals 2000 and other school restructuring efforts have led to increased data collection about individual students. Educators want to know everything about today's students, even whether they arrive at school "ready to learn." With the help of national business groups and the well-intentioned but perhaps naive support of the Annenberg Foundation, Total Quality Management is the current Band-Aid being applied to a education system that policy makers with the study A Nation at Risk, in the early 1980s declared effectively "broken." Total Quality Management demands that all "relevant" data be gleaned and applied to the process at hand whether it involves manufacturing, or shaping our children's future. To this end, the educational bureaucrats within the US Department of Education have established a National Center for Education Statistics. The Center has come up with standards for state student record databases and over 500 questions for states and local school districts to choose from in constructing their own systems. Depending on how faithfully the states follow the federal model, what could easily become the student's life long dossier may start with questions like the date of the last dental exam and the condition of soft tissue inside the student's mouth! Indeed the federal student data handbooks contains fields for the phone number of the students email provider, whether the student is a registered voter and information about the student's post high school employment. If the student moves between states, a national system called SPEEDE/ExPRESS is being put into place to transfer his or her electronic record from one jurisdiction to another. If federal planners have their way, electronic tracking will continue throughout high school and from there into the student's employment. The product of this nationalized and homogenized school record system -- the graduate -- may ultimately submit electronic portfolios, including teacher evaluations, to area employers via WORKLINK, a national program developed by Educational Testing Service. Under the guise of making school more relevant to the world of work, employers with desirable jobs will be able to glean electronically, from among thousands of area graduates, the few with the cleanest records. Those who don't make the electronic cut may walk their paper records to the nearest McDonalds. The New Information Environment: Data Bases and Public-Private Partnerships As most politicians continue to stoke citizen anger against state and national government, citizen and legislative tax revolt initiatives have left government with inadequate revenues to do its job. As a result, an alliance of politicians and some corporations has formed to promote public -private partnerships. According to its critics, that alliance is simply profiting from the disenchantment the politicians have created . In 1993 the Washington State Legislature proposed such a partnership to improve the state's highways. Construction firms on a national level were invited to bid on highway improvements to be paid for by tolls -- euphemistically known as user fees. In part encouraged by a federal project calling for "smart highways" nationwide, the proposals include toll tokens tied to individual citizens and their vehicles. Electronic sensors will decrease the value of each token and, in so doing, provide "information of commercial value" to entities like auto insurance companies, the driver's employer and any others willing to purchase the citizen's private data. This purchasing of citizen's data is promoted as a new revenue source for government. Promoters say it will keep government from having to raise taxes. In 1993 the state legislature passed a law (which in the session just ended was largely gutted) guaranteeing health insurance to all Washington citizens. In yet another public-private partnership, the state undertook to create a statewide database to share patient treatment referrals and medical records among appropriate agencies and health care providers. Missing from the legislation were adequate protection of patient privacy and the right to correct medical records. Parts of the law were repealed this year, but plans for a statewide medical database continue. The Department of Information Services is the state agency that provides telecommunications and computing infrastructure for the remainder of state government. Under George Lindamood, who arrived as Director in February 1993 and departed June 1 1995, it branched out into its own money making activities. These included a statewide compressed video network, Internet training for other state agencies and a would-be statewide information kiosk program. The kiosks represented a public-private partnership between the state, IBM and North Communications. The heaviest use of them was by job seekers who could access new job openings posted through the State Division of Employment Security. The Department of Information Services (DIS) would like to see all state agencies using the kiosks to transact as much as possible of their day-to-day business with citizens. However, it is a pilot program. At the time of our visit there were only eleven kiosks in operation. The program got negative press reviews when it found that users of the employment database were asked to enter their social security numbers. Critics maintain DIS had no legal justification for requiring the numbers and did not comply with notification requirements in the federal Privacy Act when requesting them. The Politics of Divisiveness Politics in Washington State has taken a hard turn to the right. One example has been ESSB5466, an "anti-pornography bill," that did not become law this spring only because of the courageous veto of Governor Lowry. According to Al Huff, the Director of WEDnet, the Washington State K-12 network linked to the Internet, the bill would have effectively banned the Internet from Washington K-12 schools. Why? Because it would have made the system operators of digital networks liable for any "pornographic" material found on their systems. After the Governor's veto, the House agreed to eliminate depiction of breast feeding from the obscenity statute while the Senate came back with an exemption for the Internet. The House refused to accept the senate exemption of the Internet and the bill died at the end of the legislative session. This conclusion led one observer to conclude that such an extreme right-wing agenda was not to protect children from pornography but to censor the Internet. Since our return we have been told that the issue will surface again in the legislature next year. We have found no reason to believe that the web of connected databases will be used only by the state agencies and their immediate private partners. After all, these partners have come aboard expressly to market the end product to others. Policy makers had better ponder what wide spread use of the databases could lead to. Who will benefit from what they have done? The people or the power brokers? For what is at stake is not just a question of privacy but one of being able to use the information to manipulate people and events. Consider not only what full access to the database information could mean to large corporations, but also what it could do for any kind of extremist. Consider whether the current direction leads inevitably to the further empowerment of the already powerful? Does it give them superior information and knowledge? Taking information that should be private and making it publicly accessible cannot be condoned - no matter whether it be school records, health data or smart highway reports on our travels. It is also undeniable that aggregated information collected from the public by its government at local, state, and national levels belongs to the public. The public should always have access to that data at reasonable expense which may normally be defined as the incremental cost of distribution. If the general public is denied such access, the question emerges as to whether those in power should ever be allowed to engage in any form of State sanctioned economic discrimination, let alone a targeted program aimed directly against those citizens who not only unwittingly provided the raw data being used, but also ironically funded the discriminatory agencies. We have here a convergence of technology trends that can either empower individuals to affect positively their own lives and neighborhoods, or can disenfranchise them and leave them at the mercy of the powerful should they be able to monopolize the data used for decision making. It is this very volatile mix of the middle class - afraid and on the way down - that causes us to examine information infrastructure issues in Washington State against the backdrop of broader economic and social issues. Some members of Washington State government claim to be dealing with the policy issues. However, this study finds that the state's Public Information Access Policy (PIAP) task force has failed to educate the state's citizens about these issues. It is imperative that other's step in to the vacuum left by the task force. Backed by an informed media, citizen groups must come together, possibly under a state umbrella organization, such as a Washington State Electronic Frontier Foundation. Such an organization must undertake a serious public education campaign about the privacy and social control implications of the Washington State plans, both those already activated and those proposed. The organization must be carefully crafted to keep citizens in control of the entire process. It should design an information policy commission to exist perhaps under the aegis of the judiciary. They and not the technocratic managers of state agencies would carry out reviews of state agency programs and intentions. The commission would need a process for hearings and prompt studies to be completed. It must have its own funding. Legislation to implement the commission should be promptly drafted and made a top priority for action in the next legislative session. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * From the Listowner * * * * * * * * * * * * . To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to: majordomo at scn.org In the body of the message, type: unsubscribe scn END