Articles

[Doug Tooley]

Rod-

I disagree with your proposal to remove lists.  One of those lists is the
marketplace list, which has probably only had one or two posts during the
last six months.  It is 'hibernating' for the same reasons for that the
web page was hibernating last summer.

Why, exactly do you see the need to pare down the number of lists?

-Doug

On Sun, 11 May 1997, Rod Clark wrote:

> > I know that some of the lists are under-utilized, but each committee
> > should have at least one mailing list for the communication of it's
> > members.  Plus the smaller and larger mailing lists for whatever they
> > are for... 
> 
> Nancy, 
> 
> It's not necessarily only the mailing lists that are too
> numerous and underutilized - you could say that about quite a
> few of the committees. 
> 
> I'm not going to subscribe to all the excessive number of SCN
> lists that I'd need to subscribe to, if I actually wanted to
> know more about what's going on. There are far too many SCN
> mailing lists now - again, there literally are seventeen (17)
> mailing lists. The sheer number of them is becoming more of a
> communications problem than it's worth, at least for me. Having
> this number of mailing lists is absolutely ridiculous. Why do
> you think that every group whose members may or may not send a
> message every six months needs its own list? It does not.
> 
> Rod Clark
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * *  From the Listowner  * * * * * * * * * * * *
> .	To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to:
> majordomo at scn.org		In the body of the message, type:
> unsubscribe scn
> END
> 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *  From the Listowner  * * * * * * * * * * * *
.	To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to:
majordomo at scn.org		In the body of the message, type:
unsubscribe scn
END