Copyright

[Steve Hoffman]

Strangling Culture With a Copyright Law

Steve Zeitlin
NY Times 4/25/98


In June 1940 at an oil workers' strike in Oklahoma City, Pete Seeger
and Woody Guthrie were asked to do what they did best -- get the
crowd singing at the next day's rally. A labor organizer's wife
particularly wanted to know if Guthrie knew any songs about union
women. Mr. Seeger recalls that the next morning he heard the
tap-tap-tapping of Guthrie's typewriter. When Guthrie came down for
breakfast, he had two verses and the now-famous chorus for "Union
Maid": 

Oh you can't scare me, I'm sticking to the union, 

I'm sticking to the union till the day I die. 

Bess Lomax Hawes, former director of the Folk Arts Program at the
National Endowment for the Arts, remembers a conversation she had
with Guthrie years later. "I told Woody that I thought that the
chorus of 'Union Maid' had gone so completely into oral tradition
that no one knew where it came from," she recounted. "It was part of
the cultural landscape, no longer even associated with him. He
answered, 'If that were true, it would be the greatest honor of my
life.' " 

Legislation now in Congress to extend the copyright law threatens to
make it more difficult for this nation's creativity to become part
of our cultural landscape, part of a common heritage of folklore
circulating freely in the public domain. Paradoxically, one
corporation leading the charge is among the greatest appropriators
of folk culture: Disney. 

For his animated features "Snow White" and "Cinderella," Walt Disney
drew on folktales that had been passed down by word of mouth for
hundreds of years. Now the Walt Disney Company, along with the
American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, or Ascap, and
the Gershwin Family Trust, is among those lobbying Congress to add 20
more years of copyright protection to the law. With millions of
dollars at stake each year, they are intent on keeping "intellectual
property" like Mickey Mouse from falling into the public domain. 

The Founding Fathers introduced the principle of copyright into
Article 1 of the Constitution but were careful to note that it should
last "for limited times." The first copyright law, in 1790,
guaranteed 14 years of protection with a 14-year renewal. But the
period of protection has been extended several times since. For an
individual today, a copyright now lasts for the life of the artist
plus 50 years. For a corporation, a copyright lasts 75 years. 

The time period was last extended in 1976, when many valuable
copyrights were about to expire. The new extension would prevent any
"works of authorship" from going into the public domain for 20 years.
Indeed, the powerful entertainment industry seems intent on never
allowing copyrights to expire, repeatedly lobbying for extensions at
the 11th hour. 

The 20-year extension (now named the Sonny Bono Copyright Term
Extension Act) has passed the House and is awaiting action in the
Senate. When the bill was first proposed in Congress in early 1997,
sponsors described it as a win-win situation, and proponents wondered
who, if anyone, could oppose it. 

Who? The public, in the broadest sense. We the people. 

Dennis Karjala, a law professor at the University of Arizona, has
noted that under the new law our roly-poly Santa Claus, originally
created by the 19th-century cartoonist Thomas Nast, would not have
gone into the public domain until 1973. Even the United States
Government would have had to pay royalties to use Nast's Uncle Sam in
all of this century's wars. 

Just as Uncle Sam and Santa eventually became part of the public
domain, available for anyone to use in any season, so eventually
should Mickey Mouse and Bugs Bunny take their places in our
free-to-all pantheon of cultural icons. 

Traditional singers, storytellers and quilters borrow freely from one
another. No one owns the copyright to their material. In fact,
folklorists have often found themselves in the somewhat contradictory
role of helping traditional artists to copyright their work so they
are assured of making an honest living from it. 

Early in this century, Alan Lomax -- going against the opinion of
many folklorists that traditional songs should not be copyrighted --
took what was later to become the controversial step of copyrighting
songs like Leadbelly's "Goodnight Irene" and Honey Boy Edwards's
"Worried Life Blues" in both his own and the artist's name. He argued
that record companies would never track down artists like Edwards in
the Mississippi Delta to pay royalty checks. 

No folklorist today would argue that an artist should not reap the
rewards of his labor. Yet folklorists, along with folk artists, are
equally cognizant of the value of a fertile public domain. It is the
nurturing ground for folk culture, from which songs and stories are
drawn in the first place and to which they should, half a century
after the artist's death, return. 

Proponents of the current legislation argue that an artist's
creations are a form of property that should be handed down to his or
her descendants as a form of wealth. But to treat all creative
expression as a form of capital that cannot be recycled, reused or
built upon without paying fees to the artist's descendants more than
50 years after the artist has died stifles cultural creativity. 

Ultimately, it does more for the longevity of the art, and the memory
of the artist, to assure that at some point the work receives the
extra push of circulating royalty-free. 

Some of those arguing for the extension of the copyright law have
already given us glimpses of how tight their grip on their properties
would be. In 1995, Ascap demanded that royalties be paid by Girl
Scout camps for songs sung around the campfire. The absurdity of this
reached its height when a troop of Scouts at a day camp in
California, afraid of being charged a fee, danced the Macarena in
silence. Ascap soon backed down. 

A few years earlier, Disney had engendered a similar public relations
nightmare when it tried to charge a day care center in Florida
royalties for painting Mickeys and Plutos on the walls.   L ike
Disney, Ira and George Gershwin drew on folklore and oral tradition
for their masterpiece, "Porgy and Bess." Today, the Gershwin Family
Trust points out that the copyright extension is not only about money
but also about control of how a work is presented. A co-trustee, Marc
G. Gershwin, was quoted in a recent news article as lamenting,
"Someone could turn 'Porgy and Bess' into rap music." The work of the
Gershwin brothers drew on African-American musical traditions. What
could be more appropriate? 

If corporations thought they could get away with it, they might
charge a few cents every time we copied a cartoon to distribute in
the office or hummed a song in the shower. A penny for your thoughts?
No, it's part of our role in life to make songs and stories our own,
to transform pop culture into what the sociologist Gary Fine calls
idioculture, the idiosyncratic adaptation of mass culture that occurs
in families and communities. An authentic cultural democracy, Don
Adams and Arlene Goldbard have noted, "requires active participation
in cultural life, not just passive consumption of cultural products."

In his introduction to "Rise Up Singing," the classic sing-along
collection used by many camps and Scout troops, Pete Seeger writes,
"Change a word, add a verse . . . plan for improvisation." The
interests of songwriters and screenwriters and the corporations they
work for have to be balanced against the importance of our collective
folk culture. As Mr. Seeger put it from his home in Beacon, N.Y., "The
grandchildren should be able to find some other way to make a living,
even if their grandfather did write 'How Much Is That Doggie in the
Window?' "

Steve Zeitlin, the director of City Lore: The New York Center for
Urban Folk Culture, is the author of "Because God Loves Stories: An
Anthology of Jewish Storytelling." 

Copyright 1998 The New York Times Company




* * * * * * * * * * * * * *  From the Listowner  * * * * * * * * * * * *
.	To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to:
majordomo at scn.org		In the body of the message, type:
unsubscribe scn
END