Voting

[Lois Beedle]

Would suggest that it would have to be dead dues paid up SCNA members.  At
least in Chicago the dead voter had to have been registered when they were
alive.

Thanks Steve, you gave me my first chuckle of the day.
Lois

On Thu, 10 Dec 1998, Steve wrote:

> Rich wrote:
> > Let's make it reasonably convenient for all SCNA members to vote.  
> 
> And while it's true that there may be some security or fraud issues,
> it might also be useful to do a little cost-benefit analysis.  After
> all, we're not voting for the leader of the free world here, just a
> few board members.  If someone wants to go to the trouble of
> registering dead Chicago voters to pack the SCNA board, well,
> perhaps they should get a life.  And besides, some of the folks who
> are against this proposal don't much care for the current board
> anyway, so what do they have to lose?    :) 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * *  From the Listowner  * * * * * * * * * * * *
> .	To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to:
> majordomo at scn.org		In the body of the message, type:
> unsubscribe scn
> ==== Messages posted on this list are also available on the web at: ====
> * * * * * * *     http://www.scn.org/volunteers/scn-l/     * * * * * * *
> 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *  From the Listowner  * * * * * * * * * * * *
.	To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to:
majordomo at scn.org		In the body of the message, type:
unsubscribe scn
==== Messages posted on this list are also available on the web at: ====
* * * * * * *     http://www.scn.org/volunteers/scn-l/     * * * * * * *