"e-ballot" -- an alternate proposal

[Rich Littleton]

Steven, Steven, Steven,

You are correct in reminding us that very few people showed up for the
Outreach meetingss, but that is a different problme.  It has nothing to do
with HOW we vote.

Cap;ice?

Rich


______________________________________________________________________

*****  Unless stated otherwise, this message may be forwarded.  ******

On Mon, 21 Dec 1998, Steve wrote:

> Rich wrote:
> > most committee votes would require discussion and so would LIKELY
> > (not necessarily) be by those present for the discussion.
> 
> Except that (as you experienced in Outreach) we mostly don't have 
> folks present for discussion at commitee meetings.  Which means that 
> these "committee" decisions would be made by maybe 2-4 people.  We 
> might pretend that this represents some sort of consensus, but it 
> could be a tough sell...
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * *  From the Listowner  * * * * * * * * * * * *
> .	To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to:
> majordomo at scn.org		In the body of the message, type:
> unsubscribe scn
> ==== Messages posted on this list are also available on the web at: ====
> * * * * * * *     http://www.scn.org/volunteers/scn-l/     * * * * * * *
> 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *  From the Listowner  * * * * * * * * * * * *
.	To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to:
majordomo at scn.org		In the body of the message, type:
unsubscribe scn
==== Messages posted on this list are also available on the web at: ====
* * * * * * *     http://www.scn.org/volunteers/scn-l/     * * * * * * *