"e-ballot" -- an alternate proposal

[Joe Mabel]

To which I'd like to add a concern about defining committee membership. 
 The last thing we need is for a group of gadflies who don't get the work 
themselves done to start telling active committee members what to do.  I, 
for one, try to restrict my input to suggestions, precisely because I'm not 
volunteering to carry the ball myself.

-----Original Message-----
From:	Steve [SMTP:steve at advocate.net]
Sent:	Monday, December 21, 1998 5:12 PM
To:	scn at scn.org
Subject:	Re: "e-ballot" -- an alternate proposal

Rich wrote:
> You are correct in reminding us that very few people showed up for
> the Outreach meetingss, but that is a different problme.  It has
> nothing to do with HOW we vote.

Perhaps not.  But the ongoing debate about committee procedures
(voting and otherwise) might almost lead an onlooker to believe we
actually have active committees.  As opposed to the one or two people
who might show up at a meeting, a situation not at all unique to
Outreach.  Just who are these people who will come out of the
woodwork in droves to vote by email, never having been seen before
at a committee meeting?




* * * * * * * * * * * * * *  From the Listowner  * * * * * * * * * * * *
.	To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to:
majordomo at scn.org		In the body of the message, type:
unsubscribe scn
==== Messages posted on this list are also available on the web at: ====
* * * * * * *     http://www.scn.org/volunteers/scn-l/     * * * * * * *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *  From the Listowner  * * * * * * * * * * * *
.	To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to:
majordomo at scn.org		In the body of the message, type:
unsubscribe scn
==== Messages posted on this list are also available on the web at: ====
* * * * * * *     http://www.scn.org/volunteers/scn-l/     * * * * * * *