SCN: explaining...

[Doug Schuler]

I agree with JJ.  Some people are also voting via fax and they
might like to know what's up.  

I'm assuming that the lawsuit is actually now a reality since Rich didn't 
deny it.  Now we'd like to know why he found this approach a desirable way to
address his concerns.

-- Doug

> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 22:38:06 -0800 (PST)
> From: "J. Johnson" <jj at scn.org>
> To: Rich Littleton <be718 at scn.org>
> cc: scn at scn.org
> Subject: Re: SCN: too much funny business and cognitive dissonance going on here
> 
> On Tue, 22 Feb 2000, Rich Littleton wrote:
> 
> > Whoooaaaaa, there Nelly!  Let's get a rein on this here buckin' and
> > a-yellin'.
> > 
> > I'll be at the meeting Wed. nite and will answer any questions.  
> > 
> 
> Why don't you explain this on the list, for the benefit of everyone that
> can't make it to the meeting?  Is there any problem with that?
> 
> I am quite curious as to which by-law you are accusing these Board members
> to have violated, and others undoubtably are wondering just what you were
> disciplined for.  You are the one bucking; perhaps you would tell us why?
> 
> Come on Rich, you have been advocating "openess" for several years.  So
> open up and tell us what is going on.
> 
> === JJ =================================================================
> 
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * *  From the Listowner  * * * * * * * * * * * *
> .	To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to:
> majordomo at scn.org		In the body of the message, type:
> unsubscribe scn
> ==== Messages posted on this list are also available on the web at: ====
> * * * * * * *     http://www.scn.org/volunteers/scn-l/     * * * * * * *
> 
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *  From the Listowner  * * * * * * * * * * * *
.	To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to:
majordomo at scn.org		In the body of the message, type:
unsubscribe scn
==== Messages posted on this list are also available on the web at: ====
* * * * * * *     http://www.scn.org/volunteers/scn-l/     * * * * * * *