SCN: Go with Al's Plan

[J. Johnson]

Al, I thought you were better acquainted with Rich--no?

Look at his response (below):  his view of "resolution" is how those of us
"concerned about the cost to SCN" can (supposedly) block indemnification. 
Nothing at all about why (or how) he was asked to leave e-mail training,
or dropping the suit, or his strained relations within SCN.  

Do not underestimate how much effort it takes to pin him down, on
anything.  

=== JJ =================================================================

On Mon, 3 Jul 2000, Rich Littleton wrote:

> [....]
> Al or any of those concerned about the cost to SCN file two claims:
> 	1.  Claim against the defendants challenging their claim to
> indemnification (for reasons I've already stated);
> 
> 	2.  Claim against previous board for negligence for NOT
> establishing insurance to protect SCNA funds against law suits (valid or
> invalid suits). 
> 
> If you win #1, then the lawsuit becomes irrelevant to SCNA's funds.  If
> you win #2, then you get the board to pay back the expenses lost if you
> lose #1.
> 
> Good luck, Al & Co.
> 
> 
> Rich

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *  From the Listowner  * * * * * * * * * * * *
.	To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to:
majordomo at scn.org		In the body of the message, type:
unsubscribe scn
==== Messages posted on this list are also available on the web at: ====
* * * * * * *     http://www.scn.org/volunteers/scn-l/     * * * * * * *