SCN: Correlation between drug use and terrorism

[David Barts]

I think the whole thing is one of the more blatant pieces of bullshit
I've seen in some time.

What "drugs"?  E produced in a local lab?  Local, organically-grown
pot?  Beer?  Wine?  A double-tall latte? Cigarettes?

Sure, heroin and cocaine, while being more socially responsible and
less addictive choices than cigarettes at home[1], probably _do_ support
terrorism abroad.  But "drugs" in general: no.

And forget Afghanistan's main export.  Most of the Sept. 11th
terrorists didn't come from there.  They came from Saudi Arabia.  And
we all know what their main export is.

If anything, it's buying gasoline that supports terrorism!

[1] More socially responsible?  Most definitely!  How many smack
addicts do you know who go around with full syringes, jabbing everyone
in their vicinity as well as themselves, every time they shoot up?
Cigarette addicts do the equivalent all the time with their second-hand
smoke.

-- 
         David W. Barts (davidb at scn.org) / http://www.scn.org/~davidb
      "Rats and roaches live by competition under the laws of supply and
     demand; it is the privilege of human beings to live under the laws of
                     justice and mercy." -- Wendell Berry
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *  From the Listowner  * * * * * * * * * * * *
.	To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to:
majordomo at scn.org		In the body of the message, type:
unsubscribe scn
==== Messages posted on this list are also available on the web at: ====
* * * * * * *     http://www.scn.org/volunteers/scn-l/     * * * * * * *