SCN: Fw: E-MAILS PLEASE READ
Doug Schuler
douglas at scn.org
Wed Apr 17 06:28:43 PDT 2002
If I had to say one way or the other I'd say that this note
is a hoax.
-- Doug
******************************************************************
* SHAPING THE NETWORK SOCIETY *
* Patterns for Participation, Action, and Change *
* http://www.cpsr.org/conferences/diac02 *
* Tomorrow's information and communication infrastructure *
* is being shaped today. *
* But by whom and to what ends? *
* Questions: diac02-info at cpsr.org *
******************************************************************
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, emailer1 wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: BJoh102392 at aol.com
> To: HughesB007 at aol.com ; Kayceeberry at aol.com ; calwil25 at yahoo.com ; dafulcher at yahoo.com ; meemaw1 at swbell.net ; Mdk500 at aol.com ; wlb1937 at swbell.net ; ljbates at rockdale.k12.ga.us ; Patleut at aol.com ; cmacie at bellsouth.net ; brumby2361 at yahoo.com ; penderpat at mindspring.com ; jandssloan at mindspring.com ; TommyRamona at aol.com ; STRAIL4 at cs.com ; pyancey at att.net
> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 6:30 PM
> Subject: Fwd: E-MAILS PLEASE READ
>
>
>
> ,
>
>
>
>
> Folks, please read this and send to everyone you know that uses email and send an email or letter to your government offical. Bette
>
>
>
>
>
> Linda A. Henry, Systems Analyst
> Office of Financial Management
> International Trade Administration
> 14th & Const. Ave., NW, HCH 4112
> Washington, DC 20230
> 202-482-5343
> 202-482-5584 (fax)
> linda_henry at ita.doc.gov
>
> Other OFM sites to visit:
> ITA Domestic Financial Coding Pattern
> www.ita.doc.gov/ofm_guidance/domestic.htm
>
>
> Received: from monroe.OSNET.OSEC.DOC.GOV
> ([204.193.249.56])
> by ita.doc.gov; Thu, 07 Mar 2002 12:12:34 -0500
> Received: from jackson.OSNET.OSEC.DOC.GOV ([204.193.249.58])
> by monroe.OSNET.OSEC.DOC.GOV (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.9a)
> with ESMTP id 2002030712135005:20480 ;
> Thu, 7 Mar 2002 12:13:50 -0500
>
>
>
> Subject: Fwd: Fw: Bill 602P
>
> Guess the warnings were true. Federal Bill 602P 5-cents per E-mail sent.
> It figures!No more free E-mail!We knew this was coming!! Bill 602P will
> permit the Federal Government to charge a 5-cent charge on every delivered
> E-mail.
> Please read the following carefully if you intend to stay online and
> continue using E-mail. The last few months have revealed an alarming trend
> in the
> Government of the United States attempting to quietly push through
> legislation that will affect our use of the Internet.
>
> Under proposed legislation, the US Postal Service will be attempting to
> bill E-mail users out of "alternative postage fees."
>
> Bill 602P will permit the Federal Government to charge a 5-cent surcharge
> on every e-mail delivered, by billing Internet Service Providers at source.
> The consumer would then be billed in turn by the ISP.
>
> Washington DC lawyer Richard Stepp is working without pay to prevent this
> legislation from becoming law.
>
> The US Postal Service is claiming lost revenue, due to the proliferation of
> E-mail, is costing nearly $230,000,000 in revenue per year. You may have
> noticed their recent ad campaign: "There is nothing like a letter."
>
> Since the average person received about 10 pieces of E-mail per day in
> 1998,the cost of the typical individual would be an additional 50 cents a
> day --
> or over $180 per year -- above and beyond their regular Internet costs.
> Note that this would be money paid directly to the US Postal Service for a
> service they do not even provide.
>
> The whole point of the Internet is democracy and noninterference. You are
> already paying an exorbitant price for snail mail because of bureaucratic
> inefficiency. It currently takes up to 6 days for a letter to be delivered
> from coast to coast. If the US Postal Service is allowed to tinker with
> E-mail, it will mark the end of the "free" Internet in the United States.
>
> Congressional representative, Tony Schnell (R) has even suggested a
> "$20-$40 per month surcharge on all Internet service" above and beyond the
> governments proposed E-mail charges. Note that most of the major
> newspapers have
> ignored the story the only exception being the Washingtonian which called
> the idea
> of E-mail surcharge "a useful concept who's time has come" (March 6th, 1999
> Editorial). Do not sit by and watch your freedom erode away!
>
> Send this E-mail to EVERYONE on your list, and tell all your friends and
> relatives to write their congressional representative and say "NO" to Bill
> 602P.
> It will only take a few moments of your time and could very well be
> instrumental in killing a bill we do not want.
>
> PLEASE FORWARD
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * From the Listowner * * * * * * * * * * * *
. To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to:
majordomo at scn.org In the body of the message, type:
unsubscribe scn
==== Messages posted on this list are also available on the web at: ====
* * * * * * * http://www.scn.org/volunteers/scn-l/ * * * * * * *
More information about the scn
mailing list