further thought on kid-appropriate content
Kenneth J. Crandall
bd252 at scn.org
Tue Jul 1 13:42:48 PDT 1997
This seems to be a rational approach without incorporating needless
monitoring requirements.
ken Crandall
On Mon, 30 Jun 1997, Joe Mabel wrote:
> If we are going to host web pages and are concerned with the issue of
> kid-appropriate content, the easiest thing to do is to ask people to
> self-classify rather than anyone else having to decide what is
> kid-appropriate. 99% will doubtless classify themsleves in an appropriate
> manner. If some few don't we can deal with that on a case-by-case basis
> as long as we reserve the right to do so.
>
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * From the Listowner * * * * * * * * * * * *
> . To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to:
> majordomo at scn.org In the body of the message, type:
> unsubscribe scn
> END
>
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * From the Listowner * * * * * * * * * * * *
. To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to:
majordomo at scn.org In the body of the message, type:
unsubscribe scn
END
More information about the scn
mailing list