further thought on kid-appropriate content

Kenneth J. Crandall bd252 at scn.org
Tue Jul 1 13:42:48 PDT 1997


This seems to be a rational approach without incorporating needless
monitoring requirements.
						ken Crandall

On Mon, 30 Jun 1997, Joe Mabel wrote:

> If we are going to host web pages and are concerned with the issue of
> kid-appropriate content, the easiest thing to do is to ask people to
> self-classify rather than anyone else having to decide what is
> kid-appropriate.  99% will doubtless classify themsleves in an appropriate
> manner.  If some few don't we can deal with that on a case-by-case basis
> as long as we reserve the right to do so.
> 
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * *  From the Listowner  * * * * * * * * * * * *
> .	To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to:
> majordomo at scn.org		In the body of the message, type:
> unsubscribe scn
> END
> 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *  From the Listowner  * * * * * * * * * * * *
.	To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to:
majordomo at scn.org		In the body of the message, type:
unsubscribe scn
END



More information about the scn mailing list