Discussion: Sharma and Rich

[Kenneth Crandall]

Joe,
I agree with your comments.  I do believe that the style of request can have
some impact on it implementation.
If the member suggests that making the agenda and minutes available with
spark more interest and understanding among the members, the request will
likely be acted upon.
If the member suggests that the agenda and minutes are required because the
membership can't trust the board to conduct their business fairly, the
request will not be as willingly accepted.
I am not trying to infer that either scenario above applies in this
instance, but simply am trying to show that the civility of communication
can affect the outcome of a request.  Your use of "a good faith request" is
an example of a request that should receive a positive response.
											Ken C
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Mabel [mailto:jmabel at saltmine.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 03, 1998 5:31 PM
> To: 'Kenneth Crandall'; Rich Littleton
> Cc: Sharma; scna-board at scn.org; scn at scn.org; bb140 at scn.org
> Subject: RE: Discussion: Sharma and Rich
>
>
> 1) I'm not going to attack or defend anyone's style of email
> 2) It seems reasonable that a member might ask the board to make a good
> faith effort to post agendas before board meetings and minutes afterwards.
>

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *  From the Listowner  * * * * * * * * * * * *
.	To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to:
majordomo at scn.org		In the body of the message, type:
unsubscribe scn
==== Messages posted on this list are also available on the web at: ====
* * * * * * *     http://www.scn.org/volunteers/scn-l/     * * * * * * *