No ***** Matches, please

[Rich Littleton]

Joe,

You're being entirely too nice here.  We need to get more specifice from
Kurt about the precise weak spots.  Maybe they are fixable.

Also, as I mentioned in an earlier reply, SCN's own Stefani Banerian has
already run an election in a bulletin board.  So, if her's worked then,
what won't work for SCNA?

BTW, can we adjust the "pissing match" wording. It is a tad crude, but,
more importantly, it never seemed to acquire a clear meaning.  ("Needless
arguing," "any arguing,"  "hate mail"  ??????)

Later,

Rich


______________________________________________________________________

*****  Unless stated otherwise, this message may be forwarded.  ******

On Wed, 9 Dec 1998, Joe Mabel wrote:

> Kurt's thoughts on voting strike me as mostly on the mark.  Still, it seems 
> to me that if the State of Washington has been able to tremendously 
> increase voter participation by easing the rules on absentee ballots, we 
> ought to consider whether there are places in our system where the same 
> might be appropriate.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Joe Mabel
> 206-284-7511
> "Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain." L. Frank Baum
> 
> 
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * *  From the Listowner  * * * * * * * * * * * *
> .	To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to:
> majordomo at scn.org		In the body of the message, type:
> unsubscribe scn
> ==== Messages posted on this list are also available on the web at: ====
> * * * * * * *     http://www.scn.org/volunteers/scn-l/     * * * * * * *
> 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *  From the Listowner  * * * * * * * * * * * *
.	To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to:
majordomo at scn.org		In the body of the message, type:
unsubscribe scn
==== Messages posted on this list are also available on the web at: ====
* * * * * * *     http://www.scn.org/volunteers/scn-l/     * * * * * * *