Background checks

[Janos Szablya]

Kurt 
the hazard of not acting responsably is loosing the system that we have
built...
Kurt, I know that I have cleared the system....there is little doubt that
all of us will... but if we don't ....we could be considered negligant is
a future action..  

This is a standard that we will have to impose on ourselves or face the
reality of a dwindling support from our users and corperate supporters.

The standard is that of outside influence.... and given the nature of our
history we have always been affected by that force.

Janos


> 
> Not one genuine hazard or existing safety condition was identified here!
> It's all vague, mushy stuff, about what might possibly happen.  It's the
> sort of thing all the Nice People and Ed.D. cush-makers at Columbine
> HS were busy with *before* the shooting, and probably what they are
> busy with right now: counting their toes, verifying their colleagues'
> toe-counts, and making policy.  Fat lot of good it did them...
> 
> And *fear* as a basis of policy is never assuaged for long, which means
> that the policies intended to assuage that fear lose their efficacy
> (and note most carefully that this happens regardless of whether any
> incidents covered by the policies occur or not!), and the fear comes back,
> in a sort of "relaxation"-type periodicity, giving a cyclic character to
> the process.  In electronics, an RC oscillator exhibits these properties
> nicely.  So do addictions of various sorts.
> 
> Unfortunately, while fear has the properties of accumulation and
> dissipation, the policies they drive are long-lived artifacts, which
> hang around, accreting, over many fear-cycles.  So what emerges out of
> all of this is sort of a ratcheting-type pattern that eventually even
> causes the policy-makers to complain (the only element of justice in the
> whole affair, usually long-delayed).  And this is why it's fundamentally
> unsound.
> 
> On a national scale, I think Thomas Jefferson guessed the optimal
> time-constant to be about 20 years :)
> 
> Unless policy-makers are mindful of this stuff *and* don't want it
> to happen.  Note the conjunction.
> --kurt
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * *  From the Listowner  * * * * * * * * * * * *
> .	To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to:
> majordomo at scn.org		In the body of the message, type:
> unsubscribe scn
> ==== Messages posted on this list are also available on the web at: ====
> * * * * * * *     http://www.scn.org/volunteers/scn-l/     * * * * * * *
> 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *  From the Listowner  * * * * * * * * * * * *
.	To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to:
majordomo at scn.org		In the body of the message, type:
unsubscribe scn
==== Messages posted on this list are also available on the web at: ====
* * * * * * *     http://www.scn.org/volunteers/scn-l/     * * * * * * *