BD: Background Checks

[Janos Szablya]

An accidental error in programing can expose us to liability. In todays
society the mentality of the "sewers" (pun intended) is the danger, we
cannot live i a dream world.

Janos

On Sat, 23 Oct 1999, Rich Littleton wrote:

> 
> If and when SCN gets involved (on a one-on-one basis) with special
> populations, then we can certainly talk about the need for this.  We
> certainly do have a choice about becoming yet another participant in
> our own drift toward a police-mentality organization.
> 
> Until we actually get involved with special groups, I'd prefer to see us
> RECRUIT vols and PLAN good programs for the community.
> 
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> 
> *****  Unless stated otherwise, this message may be forwarded.  ******
> 
> On Sat, 23 Oct 1999, Sharma wrote:
> 
> > 
> > 
> > As a nurse I have been background checked pretty much every year for the
> > last several years. You fill out a very short form, give it to the
> > organization asking for it, and that's it.
> > 
> > Anyone who is in contact with a helpless population, i.e. kids, disabled
> > people, anyone who might be vulnerable, must be background checked to make
> > sure they are not a convicted sex offender or other type of predator. The
> > law is quite clear about the responsibility of organizations to do this.
> > 
> > Now it may not apply to classes held in public libraries but would if
> > anyone was going to peoples homes or in contact with kids in a not so
> > public place. One school I was thinking of doing volunteer work at would
> > have done a check on me before I could enter their building to do
> > volunteer work.
> > 
> > In the police state we live in we do not have much choice about this and
> > I found it more annoying to think about than to do.
> > 
> > -sharma
> > 
> > 
> > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > > Date: Thu, 21 Oct 1999 19:30:54 -0000
> > > From: jdean <jdean at oz.net>
> > > Subject: BD: Background Checks
> > > 
> > > Randy, et. al.
> > > 
> > > I volunteered with Washington Special Olympics (WSO) for many years as an
> > > organizer (one of many) of the state-wide Summer Games.  For the last ten
> > > years or so they have required background checks for certain classes of
> > > volunteers.  The required background check is really perfunctory and is run
> > > by the Washington State Patrol.  All they do is search their database of
> > > arrests/convictions looking for a match on the volunteers name and render a
> > > report to the requesting organization (ie WSO).  WSO has to have the
> > > volunteer's consenting signature on the background check request form or the
> > > WSP will not do the check.  No one goes around interviewing your
> > > associates... it is not like getting a security clearance.
> > > 
> > > We were told by WSO that the check was required by state law and that WSO
> > > would be in serious trouble if they employed a volunteer who had not passed
> > > the check.  The law applied only to volunteers who would have "sole
> > > supervision" of minors or other persons not legally competent.  No one I
> > > know of really looked into this claim by WSO, nor did we look up the text of
> > > the law.  We did all assume that it had something to do with screening out
> > > known sex offenders.
> > > 
> > > There may well be other variations of the law WSO was reacting to, and some
> > > of that may apply to the occasional volunteer job in SCN... but I think not
> > > to most, only to a very few.
> > > 
> > > The Treasurer is another matter... bonding is the issue there.  It is
> > > rudimentary prudence to have your Treasurer bonded, as much so in a
> > > volunteer organization as in a commercial enterprise.  And the bonding
> > > company will simply refuse to issue the bond unless their criteria are met
> > > by the proposed bondee.  Disagreeing with their criteria, even if they will
> > > disclose them to you (problematic), is neither useful nor relevant.  So the
> > > answer for the Treasurer candidate is: do not stand for Treasurer unless you
> > > are willing to go through the process of getting bonded.
> > > 
> > > Regards
> > > 
> > > John Dean
> > > 
> > 
> > * * * * * * * * * * * * * *  From the Listowner  * * * * * * * * * * * *
> > .	To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to:
> > majordomo at scn.org		In the body of the message, type:
> > unsubscribe scn
> > ==== Messages posted on this list are also available on the web at: ====
> > * * * * * * *     http://www.scn.org/volunteers/scn-l/     * * * * * * *
> > 
> 
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * *  From the Listowner  * * * * * * * * * * * *
> .	To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to:
> majordomo at scn.org		In the body of the message, type:
> unsubscribe scn
> ==== Messages posted on this list are also available on the web at: ====
> * * * * * * *     http://www.scn.org/volunteers/scn-l/     * * * * * * *
> 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *  From the Listowner  * * * * * * * * * * * *
.	To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to:
majordomo at scn.org		In the body of the message, type:
unsubscribe scn
==== Messages posted on this list are also available on the web at: ====
* * * * * * *     http://www.scn.org/volunteers/scn-l/     * * * * * * *