SCN: RE: too much funny business and cognitive dissonance going on here

[Kenneth Crandall]

This blows my mind away.   Several months ago there was communication going
on about how to involve people more actively as volunteers in the SCN
program.   Rich was one of the correspondents.

If this statement is true, I can't think of a more destructive way to
communicate to prospective and current volunteers.   If this goes through, I
don't believe there will be anymore arguments about SCN actions or lack of
action because most volunteers will just quit.

I hope that I hear that this is a mistake.

					Ken Crandall

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-scn at scn.org [mailto:owner-scn at scn.org]On Behalf Of Kurt
Cockrum
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2000 8:40 AM
To: scn at scn.org
Subject: SCN: too much funny business and cognitive dissonance going on
here


I recently resurfaced after a long hiatus (not long enough, I'm
afraid) and went to a Hardware Committee meeting where I learned that
Rich Littleton is *sueing* various of the current Board of Directors
(and their spouses, too!), to the tune of around $50K or so.

Rich, before your imminent self-immolation, would you care to explain
yourself??
--kurt
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *  From the Listowner  * * * * * * * * * * * *
.	To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to:
majordomo at scn.org		In the body of the message, type:
unsubscribe scn
==== Messages posted on this list are also available on the web at: ====
* * * * * * *     http://www.scn.org/volunteers/scn-l/     * * * * * * *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *  From the Listowner  * * * * * * * * * * * *
.	To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to:
majordomo at scn.org		In the body of the message, type:
unsubscribe scn
==== Messages posted on this list are also available on the web at: ====
* * * * * * *     http://www.scn.org/volunteers/scn-l/     * * * * * * *