SCN: explaining the funny business
Steve Mudd
muddman at scn.org
Wed Feb 23 15:26:52 PST 2000
Hey SCN-
I don't follow every thread on this list, but I'm
glad I caught this one. I had no idea that Rich Littleton was
suing SCNA board members (and their spouses?). I moved
from Seattle a couple of years ago, but at one time I was a
regular SCN vol, and still think of it as my 'net roots. The
idea that a freenet could be muzzled and eviscerated by a
couple of frivolous suits seems ridiculous, and weird. I
would be interested in hearing Rich present a rational defense
for his actions. Say Rich, maybe you should add a line to
your board candidate page, like "...and I'll sue the socks
off anyone who offends me."
-Steve
----- Original Message -----
From: "Doug Schuler" <douglas at scn.org>
To: <scn at scn.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 10:51 PM
Subject: SCN: explaining...
> I agree with JJ. Some people are also voting via fax and they
> might like to know what's up.
>
> I'm assuming that the lawsuit is actually now a reality since Rich didn't
> deny it. Now we'd like to know why he found this approach a desirable
way to
> address his concerns.
>
> -- Doug
>
> > Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 22:38:06 -0800 (PST)
> > From: "J. Johnson" <jj at scn.org>
> > To: Rich Littleton <be718 at scn.org>
> > cc: scn at scn.org
> > Subject: Re: SCN: too much funny business and cognitive dissonance
going on here
> >
> > On Tue, 22 Feb 2000, Rich Littleton wrote:
> >
> > > Whoooaaaaa, there Nelly! Let's get a rein on this here buckin' and
> > > a-yellin'.
> > >
> > > I'll be at the meeting Wed. nite and will answer any questions.
> > >
> >
> > Why don't you explain this on the list, for the benefit of everyone that
> > can't make it to the meeting? Is there any problem with that?
> >
> > I am quite curious as to which by-law you are accusing these Board members
> > to have violated, and others undoubtably are wondering just what you were
> > disciplined for. You are the one bucking; perhaps you would tell us why?
> >
> > Come on Rich, you have been advocating "openess" for several years. So
> > open up and tell us what is going on.
> >
> > === JJ =================================================================
> >
> > * * * * * * * * * * * * * * From the Listowner * * * * * * * * * * * *
> > . To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to:
> > majordomo at scn.org In the body of the message, type:
> > unsubscribe scn
> > ==== Messages posted on this list are also available on the web at: ====
> > * * * * * * * http://www.scn.org/volunteers/scn-l/ * * * * * * *
> >
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * From the Listowner * * * * * * * * * * * *
> . To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to:
> majordomo at scn.org In the body of the message, type:
> unsubscribe scn
> ==== Messages posted on this list are also available on the web at: ====
> * * * * * * * http://www.scn.org/volunteers/scn-l/ * *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * From the Listowner * * * * * * * * * * * *
. To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to:
majordomo at scn.org In the body of the message, type:
unsubscribe scn
==== Messages posted on this list are also available on the web at: ====
* * * * * * * http://www.scn.org/volunteers/scn-l/ * * * * * * *
More information about the scn
mailing list