SCN: Re: OPS: w3m ...

[AH]

2¢    
2¢ Joe Mabel wrote:
2¢ 
2¢ > If SCN's decision not to fundraise from corporations and to focus on a
2¢ > volunteer
2¢ > staff leads directly to this sort of consequence, I think this consequence
2¢ > calls that decision into question.
2¢ 


On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, Gianni Truzzi wrote:

2¢ 
2¢ Allow me to correct this mistaken belief. The Board of SCNA has NOT made
2¢ any such decision. In fact, we expect to begin soliciting corporate and
2¢ foundation funding rather vigorously in the coming months. However, that
2¢ kind of fundraising effort has taken a back seat to other efforts for
2¢ which it would be prerequisite. It's simply been a matter of allocating
2¢ 


This "mistaken" belief was first espoused by a member of the Board, and
made to sound like a policy decision. 

http://www.scn.org/volunteers/scn-l/msg00022.html

Perhaps if we had published minutes it could be made more clear how this
confusion arose...

-Andrew






* * * * * * * * * * * * * *  From the Listowner  * * * * * * * * * * * *
.	To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to:
majordomo at scn.org		In the body of the message, type:
unsubscribe scn
==== Messages posted on this list are also available on the web at: ====
* * * * * * *     http://www.scn.org/volunteers/scn-l/     * * * * * * *