Amazingly Correct! SCN: $86,000 (was: Put up or shut up.)

[Rich Littleton]

I can't believe it.  I actually agree with JJ in much of what he said.

I would alter "credibilty" to something more like "board responsibility."
But JJ is generally right.

His money figure is outdated, but that is secondary.

I would also add that, if the miscreants are successful in getting their
hands on SCNA money IN THE SHORT TERM, that will drain SCNA coffers.  --
even though the miscreants will eventually lose.  At that point, they will
owe SCNA the money taken (?), but that could be after SCNA funds have been
heavily used up in the meantime.

This is very serious organization business.

Rich


 
______________________________________________________________________


On Sun, 25 Jun 2000, J. Johnson wrote:

> Irene, and all other bystanders:  this is not some petty, private quarrel
> between Rich and three or four or a dozen people that don't like him.  It
> comes down to credibility.  Rich would probably say it's the credibility
> of the Board at stake; the rest of us would say it's his credibility on
> the line.  You bystanders are the jury; the issue is not going anywhere,
> let alone away, until you all come down one way or the other.  (Or all of
> the disputants on one side or the other all go away.)
> 
> It is also a matter of a large sum of money.  As only one of several
> issues here, it is an uncontroverted fact that Rich has sued several Board
> members and other SCN volunteers, asking for damages of around $86,000.
> And if Rich were to win, most of us read the by-laws as requiring SCNA to
> foot the bill--which would bankrupt us.  Is this petty?
> 
> The matter is neither petty nor private--it could involve SCN's
> existence.  (Rich says no; read the by-laws and decide for yourself.)  
> A fist-fight would be quite irrelevant.
> 
> === JJ =================================================================
> 
> On Sun, 25 Jun 2000, Irene Mogol wrote:
> 
> > All this stuff is getting pretty boring and repetitive and going nowhere
> > fast.  I would think that all of you, being intelligent people, could
> > settle this matter in a civilized way - face to face.  
> > 
> > A good place for the meeting would be on any vacant lot, with you all
> > coming out, fists first. I would be honored to be the referee, and even
> > organize a cheering (first-aid) squad.
> > 
> > May the best man win?????
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * *  From the Listowner  * * * * * * * * * * * *
> .	To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to:
> majordomo at scn.org		In the body of the message, type:
> unsubscribe scn
> ==== Messages posted on this list are also available on the web at: ====
> * * * * * * *     http://www.scn.org/volunteers/scn-l/     * * * * * * *
> 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *  From the Listowner  * * * * * * * * * * * *
.	To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to:
majordomo at scn.org		In the body of the message, type:
unsubscribe scn
==== Messages posted on this list are also available on the web at: ====
* * * * * * *     http://www.scn.org/volunteers/scn-l/     * * * * * * *