SCN: Put up or shut up (Enough! Enough!).

[Kenneth Crandall]

Hi all,

I would seem that this provides a rational avenue to end this energy wasting
efforts and concern about the financial aspects related to the pending
lawsuit.  There should be a grievance review procedure,  a method of
establishing one if none exists,  or use the Governance committee if that is
the best procedure and give Rich his review before his fellow SCNA members
rather that solve internal problems in the court.

Assuming the Rich is as concerned about SCNA as he professes, having this
review within SCNA should allow him to withdraw his suit and everyone can
concentrate on productive ventures.

I hope those involved will see this or some other process as preferable to
the mess we are currently in.
						Kenneth Crandall

-----Original Message-----
From: Rich Littleton [mailto:be718 at scn.org]
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2000 1:01 PM
To: Kenneth Crandall
Cc: Irene Mogol; Joe Mabel; 'J. Johnson'; scn at scn.org
Subject: RE: SCN: Put up or shut up.



Herein lies the seriousness of the refusal of the Governance committee to
handle this.  Whatever your feeling on this issue, the fact that the
Governance committee refused to handle this and other complaints is
precisely what led to the filing of a suit:  There was no workable forum.

Rich


* * * * * * * * * * * * * *  From the Listowner  * * * * * * * * * * * *
.	To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to:
majordomo at scn.org		In the body of the message, type:
unsubscribe scn
==== Messages posted on this list are also available on the web at: ====
* * * * * * *     http://www.scn.org/volunteers/scn-l/     * * * * * * *