SCN: Put up or shut up.

[J. Johnson]

Governance refused to handle this?  Absolutely FALSE!!

Governance arranged for a mediator, but _Rich_ refused to respond.  

The 'forum', and any other mechanisms SCN has for resolving problems, may
be slow, inadequate, and amateurish.  But--the primary reason it didn't
work in this case is because >>Rich refused to participate<<.

Quite aside from Rich's alternate reality and general intransigence:
If SCN's (more properly, SCNA's) dispute resolution mechanisms really
worked, he would have been shown the door a couple of years ago.

=== JJ =================================================================

On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Rich Littleton wrote:

> 
> Herein lies the seriousness of the refusal of the Governance committee to
> handle this.  Whatever your feeling on this issue, the fact that the
> Governance committee refused to handle this and other complaints is
> precisely what led to the filing of a suit:  There was no workable forum.
> 
> Rich
> 



* * * * * * * * * * * * * *  From the Listowner  * * * * * * * * * * * *
.	To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to:
majordomo at scn.org		In the body of the message, type:
unsubscribe scn
==== Messages posted on this list are also available on the web at: ====
* * * * * * *     http://www.scn.org/volunteers/scn-l/     * * * * * * *