SCN: The judge didn't buy it.

[Joe Mabel]

I would strongly urge that SCN swallow this rather than exacerbate matters by
countersuing Rich. I think it would set a terrible precedent to sue a member who
believed they had a grievance, even if a court deemed the matter not actionable.

--------------------
Joe Mabel

On Sat, 7 Apr 2001, Malcolm Taran wrote:

> 
> May SCN request reimbursement?
> 
> On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, J. Johnson wrote:
> > It was announced at the ExComm meeting last night that SCN's motion to
> > have Rich's suit tossed out was granted.  The judge effectively said that
> > even with the most favorable interpretation Rich did not have a case with
> > any of his complaints.  (So now he'll probably sue the judge!)
> > 
> > I've been told that SCN's out-of-pocket costs on this are somewhere around
> > $4,000.
> > 
> > === JJ =============================================================
> 
> These costs appear to be independent of the purposes of SCN, as well
> as independent of the purposes of volunteers and contributors.
> 
> Malcolm Taran
> 
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * *  From the Listowner  * * * * * * * * * * * *
> .	To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to:
> majordomo at scn.org		In the body of the message, type:
> unsubscribe scn
> ==== Messages posted on this list are also available on the web at: ====
> * * * * * * *     http://www.scn.org/volunteers/scn-l/     * * * * * * *
> 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *  From the Listowner  * * * * * * * * * * * *
.	To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to:
majordomo at scn.org		In the body of the message, type:
unsubscribe scn
==== Messages posted on this list are also available on the web at: ====
* * * * * * *     http://www.scn.org/volunteers/scn-l/     * * * * * * *