SCN: The judge didn't buy it.

[J. Johnson]

I have to disagree with Joe on this.  This matter is not about "a member
... who had a grievance", but a member who is not only intractable in his
views, but hyper-legalistic in his sensibilities.  It was Rich's choice to
have his grievance judged in a legal venue; so let him be equally
answerable in the same venue for the harm he has caused.  

=== JJ =============================================================

On Sat, 7 Apr 2001, Joe Mabel wrote:

> I would strongly urge that SCN swallow this rather than exacerbate matters by
> countersuing Rich. I think it would set a terrible precedent to sue a member who
> believed they had a grievance, even if a court deemed the matter not actionable.
> 
> --------------------
> Joe Mabel
> 
> On Sat, 7 Apr 2001, Malcolm Taran wrote:
> 
> > 
> > May SCN request reimbursement?
> > 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *  From the Listowner  * * * * * * * * * * * *
.	To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to:
majordomo at scn.org		In the body of the message, type:
unsubscribe scn
==== Messages posted on this list are also available on the web at: ====
* * * * * * *     http://www.scn.org/volunteers/scn-l/     * * * * * * *