SCN: Semantic web
Doug Schuler
douglas at scn.org
Fri Feb 22 09:22:37 PST 2002
I met one of the main people behind this effort last November in Kyoto.
My question to him: People have been working with semantic nets for 20
years without gaining any particular value out of that approach -- why did
he think that moving it to the web would do it? He thought that making
the conceptual underpinnings available to all might make the payoff
*emerge* -- and he might be right. The effort was quite heavily funded by
military R&D and corporations. I'm not sure what their vision is vs.,
say, what an SCN type vision is. (PS. for my more *political* view of a
"world brain" see http://www.infosoc.co.uk/current/Featurearticle4.2.pdf.)
-- Doug
******************************************************************
* SHAPING THE NETWORK SOCIETY *
* Patterns for Participation, Action, and Change *
* http://www.cpsr.org/conferences/diac02 *
* Tomorrow's information and communication infrastructure *
* is being shaped today. *
* But by whom and to what ends? *
* Questions: diac02-info at cpsr.org *
******************************************************************
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Steve wrote:
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> ===================
>
>
> (Otis Port, BusinessWeek, excerpts)---Tim Berners-Lee...wanted to make
> the world a richer place, not amass personal wealth. So he gave his
> brainchild to us all.
>
> Now, the idealistic father of the Web plans an even grander gift: a next-
> generation Web that almost certainly will rank as the most important
> software of this decade. Berners-Lee regards today's Web as a rebellious
> adolescent that can never fulfill his original expectations. By 2005, he
> hopes to begin replacing it with the Semantic Web--a smart network that
> will finally understand human languages and make computers virtually as
> easy to work with as other humans.
>
> This new project is a collaborative effort of hundreds of minds, with
> Berners-Lee as maestro. The ultimate goal: to turn the Web into a gigantic
> brain.
>
> Every computer connected to the Internet would have access to all the
> knowledge that humankind has accumulated in science, business, and the
> arts since we began painting the walls of caves 30,000 years ago. This
> racial memory would be a constant source of inspiration for dreaming
> sublime dreams, boosting human creativity, and solving previously
> intractable problems.
>
> Online commerce chores and Web services would be handled by software
> modules that snap together like toy Lego blocks. "We expect the Semantic
> Web to be as big a revolution as the original Web itself," says Richard
> Hayes-Roth, Hewlett-Packard's chief technology officer for software.
>
> To get there, though, Berners-Lee must navigate some very muddy
> waters. Development of the Semantic Web is being funded mainly by the
> World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), which he heads. Founded in 1994
> and based at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the W3C is the
> guardian of Web technology and standards. Its budget relies heavily on
> membership dues from more than 400 companies.
>
> And while making money may not be a primary motivator for Berners-Lee,
> it's what business is all about. Conflicts, in short, were inevitable--and not
> just centering around Berners-Lee. Indeed, mediating the inevitable
> clashes among W3C's hundreds of companies, each with its own agenda,
> will be the acid test of Berners-Lee's leadership.
>
> A particularly thorny issue cropped up last August. A W3C committee of 13
> members, including IBM and Microsoft, proposed installing tollbooths on
> the Information Highway by allowing patented software to be included in
> W3C-approved standards. The committee reasoned that as online
> offerings grow more sophisticated, the developers of software for handling
> advanced Web services, such as supply-chain management and
> collaborative engineering, should be permitted to collect royalties on their
> investments.
>
> But Berners-Lee is philosophically opposed to standards that would
> impose fees, and many other W3C members, such as the Free Software
> Foundation and the Open Source Initiative, also denounced the notion.
> "Things have calmed down a bit," says Robert S. Sutor, IBM's director of e-
> business standards, and the committee is now rethinking its stance.
> Berners-Lee says the mood has now shifted "strongly toward a royalty-
> free position."
>
> Meanwhile, the W3C is taking heat on other fronts. Critics say the
> organization is moving too slowly on developing standards to ensure that
> different Web-service offerings can work together.
>
> Business sees major revenue growth from better tools that can deal with
> complicated travel arrangements, say, or deliver new entertainment
> options. But companies are reluctant to invest in developing such software
> until big corporations are on the same page.
>
> What good would it do, for example, to create a program under Microsoft's
> Web-services initiative, dubbed .Net, if it couldn't link up with a related
> program written in Java for Sun Microsystems' counterpart? Or if a
> computer-aided design program at Boeing
> Corp. were unable to talk to the company's engineering or
> manufacturing software?
>
> A W3C draft specification aimed at harmonizing Web services was
> published in January, 2001, "but the W3C then sat on its hands for
> a whole year" complains Uttam M. Narsu, an analyst at Giga
> Information Group. Not until late January did the W3C organize
> several working groups to tackle standards for Web services.
>
> "My sense is that W3C staffers are too visionary," Narsu says.
> "They're devoting too much effort to the Semantic Web, believing it
> will change the world yet again, and not enough effort to less sexy
> things that are important to business in the near term."
>
> The Semantic Web is certainly sexy. As envisioned by Berners-
> Lee, it would understand not only the meaning of words and
> concepts but also the logical relationships among them. That has
> awesome potential.
>
> Most knowledge is built on two pillars: semantics and mathematics.
> In number-crunching, computers already outclass people.
> Machines that are equally adroit at dealing with language and
> reason won't just help people uncover new insights; they could
> blaze new trails on their own.
>
> Even with a fairly crude version of this future Web, mining online
> repositories for nuggets of knowledge would no longer force
> people to wade through screen after screen of extraneous data.
> Instead, computers would dispatch intelligent agents, or software
> messengers, to explore Web sites by the thousands and logically
> sift out just what's relevant.
>
> That alone would provide a major boost in productivity at work and
> at home. But there's far more.
>
> Software agents could also take on many routine business chores,
> such as helping manufacturers find and negotiate with lowest-cost
> parts suppliers and handling help-desk questions. The Semantic
> Web would also be a bottomless trove of eureka insights.
>
> Most inventions and scientific breakthroughs, including today's
> Web, spring from novel combinations of existing knowledge. The
> Semantic Web would make it possible to evaluate more
> combinations overnight than a person could juggle in a lifetime.
>
> "A lot of scientific research is now interdisciplinary, like global
> climate change, and the scientists need to talk to each other," says
> Chaitanya Baru, a data-mining expert at the San Diego
> Supercomputer Center. "But they use different jargon."
>
> Sure, scientists and other people can post ideas on the Web today
> for others to read. But with machines doing the reading and
> translating jargon terms, related ideas from millions of Web pages
> could be distilled and summarized. That will lift the ability to assess
> and integrate information to new heights.
>
> As a result, Berners-Lee envisions a new age of enlightenment.
> The Semantic Web, he predicts, "will help more people become
> more intuitive as well as more analytical. It will foster global
> collaborations among people with diverse cultural perspectives, so
> we have a better chance of finding the right solutions to the really
> big issues--like the environment and climate warming." In short, it
> will change the world even more than his original creation.
>
> The capital-Q question is: Can he pull it off? There's no shortage
> of doubters. Still, most people who know the reclusive Berners-Lee
> are optimistic. "Tim has a gift for seeing the future and making it
> happen," says John R. Patrick, a retired IBM senior exec who
> helped found the W3C.
>
> Eric E. Schmidt, formerly of Sun and now chairman of search-
> engine innovator Google Inc., says Berners-Lee would be a shoo-
> in for a Nobel prize--if Nobels were given in computer science. And
> Larry L. Smarr, director of the California Institute of
> Telecommunications & Information Technology at the University of
> California at San Diego, predicts the Semantic Web will cast
> Berners-Lee as "an historic-level figure."
>
> What impresses those elder statesmen of computing is Berners-
> Lee's leadership track record. For a somewhat shy software nerd,
> he has demonstrated a surprising flair for diplomacy, combined
> with bulldog tenacity.
>
> In the midst of the dot-com bust two years ago, Berners-Lee
> persuaded the W3C's hard-nosed denizens of commerce to begin
> developing the Semantic Web. And before that, in 1998, he
> persuaded them to approve extensible markup language (XML), an
> important new Web lingo. "Tim did a great job shepherding XML
> through the W3C," notes Smarr.
>
> Indeed, the evolution of XML may be a useful foretaste of what's in
> store for the Berners-Lee's new vision. In the late 1990s, this
> language was constructed to help computers identify different
> types of data on the Web. "When we started work on XML, it was
> considered pretty esoteric," recalls Sutor of IBM. "But now it's the
> underpinnings of everything we're doing in e-business."
>
> Ditto for hundreds of others, including the 300 companies already
> using XML software from Open Applications Group Inc. OAGI
> predicts that number will double this year.
>
> Berners-Lee worked tirelessly to win support for XML because it's
> a quantum leap beyond today's witless hypertext markup language
> (HTML)--and it's the cornerstone of the Semantic Web.
>
> HTML is the language that Berners-Lee concocted while on a
> fellowship as a database engineer at the European Organization
> for Nuclear Research (CERN) in Geneva. But the language merely
> specifies the appearance of a Web page: what colors go where,
> which type sizes to use, and where to put graphic elements.
>
> To a Web browser, or most other computer programs, these words
> and numbers are just squiggles of gibberish. Without some kind of
> clue, computers parsing a Web page can't determine if "buy" is a
> noun or a verb, or whether "20031" is a Zip Code, a price, or the
> number of orders placed last month.
>
> In contrast, XML tags imbue the Web with meaning. Examples
> might be labels for medical records. The "name" tag would have
> links to relevant sections of online literature, also coded with XML,
> and "interaction" would point to other drugs that interfere with the
> medication. Then, when a doctor bats out a prescription on a
> computer, a software agent could verify that the drug is
> appropriate for the diagnosis, check the patient's records to see
> what other medicines the person is taking, and determine whether
> any of them is likely to interfere with the new prescription. A group
> of university and industrial researchers is already working on such
> a scheme with the Veterans Administration and the National
> Library of Medicine.
>
> Today, Berners-Lee presides over a research octopus whose
> tentacles extend to all five continents. The 60 staffers at W3C
> headquarters coordinate the efforts of hundreds of researchers at
> 50 university and government laboratories that are W3C members,
> plus two-score additional universities around the world.
>
> For now, most of the actual work on the Semantic Web is being
> done by academics because, Berners-Lee quips, "only a few
> industry people have been given a little leeway to go off and
> explore my crazy ideas."
>
> XML is a start--but only the tip of the iceberg. XML tags are
> essentially just labels that point to a definition in a combination
> dictionary and thesaurus. That's how a software agent can
> determine that two different tags actually mean the same thing.
> When an agent needs further details, there's an online
> encyclopedia, called an ontology. It lays out the logical rules and
> relationships among XML terms.
>
> Merging these elements is where semantics gets sticky. Because
> we humans assimilate language gradually, we end up unaware of
> how complicated things are--until we try to construct a new digital
> grammar from scratch, with numerous dialects for various
> industries.
>
> Devising software that can comprehend words, concepts, and
> relationships has long been a major hangup in artificial intelligence
> (AI) research. Adding a pervasive layer of standardization will test
> the limits of human ingenuity--and patience.
>
> In the fast-paced Internet Age, the time needed to build consensus
> on the smallest of these details could be the Semantic Web's chief
> obstacle, says MCI's Cerf. He worries that standards could "fall
> victim to business maneuvering" by the W3C's corporate members.
> The result might end up similar to today's systems for electronic
> data interchange (EDI)--with a lot of proprietary systems, each with
> its own lingo.
>
> On the other hand, partly because the industry is acutely aware of
> EDI's problems and limitations, executives are optimistic. "It'll be a
> chicken-or-egg situation until a killer app comes along--but I'm very
> confident that that will happen," says W. Daniel Hillis, a
> supercomputer pioneer who now heads startup Applied Minds Inc.
>
> Some academics are enthusiastic about the corporate involvement
> that Berners-Lee has attracted. James A. Hendler, a computer
> scientist at the University of Maryland, says he has worked on AI
> for 20 years and "it has been almost impossible to get the attention
> of business." But now, he says, "the advances we made in the
> 1990s are being readied for actual use with the Semantic Web, out
> there in the real world."
>
> One other factor could give Berners-Lee's vision an enormous
> boost: The Pentagon's Defense Advanced Research Projects
> Agency (DARPA) is pushing it. This is the outfit that created the
> guts of the Internet three decades ago. In 1998, it launched the
> DARPA Agent MarkUp Language (DAML) program--initially
> managed by Hendler, who took a leave of absence from Maryland.
> DARPA is now a W3C member, and DAML is being developed in
> concert with XML.
>
> DARPA wants to develop agent-based systems for command-and-
> control jobs in joint military operations, whether they be
> multiservice or multinational. For example, an international team of
> 16 organizations--led by a spin-off of Britain's Defense Ministry
> called QinetiQ Ltd.--is working on a "coalition of agents" project.
> With DAML tags pointing to online databases, plus access to
> satellite reconnaissance images, the agents would be aware of the
> capabilities and locations of the many different weapons and
> logistics systems deployed to such spots as Afghanistan. So they
> could provide commanders with instant advice for coping with
> shifting conditions.
>
> DARPA is also funding research at MIT, headed by Berners-Lee
> but separate from the W3C, aimed at creating new AI tools for
> tomorrow's Web. One result would be Semantic Web logic
> language (Swell). Another goal is to marry the Semantic Web with
> MIT's Oxygen project, which aims to make various digital systems
> as easy to use as breathing, thanks to advanced machine-learning
> tricks and new AI software.
>
> Cailliau, Berners-Lee's former boss at CERN, figures the Web's inventor
> relishes this research. "I think Tim does not really like the role" of leading a
> big outfit like the W3C, says Cailliau. "He is more comfortable with a small
> team and joining in the fun of writing actual code."
>
> Berners-Lee admits that building consensus among the W3C's members
> can be trying at times. But someone needs to keep development of the
> Semantic Web on course toward enriching the world--and nobody is better
> qualified than Tim.
>
>
> Copyright 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * From the Listowner * * * * * * * * * * * *
> . To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to:
> majordomo at scn.org In the body of the message, type:
> unsubscribe scn
> ==== Messages posted on this list are also available on the web at: ====
> * * * * * * * http://www.scn.org/volunteers/scn-l/ * * * * * * *
>
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * From the Listowner * * * * * * * * * * * *
. To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to:
majordomo at scn.org In the body of the message, type:
unsubscribe scn
==== Messages posted on this list are also available on the web at: ====
* * * * * * * http://www.scn.org/volunteers/scn-l/ * * * * * * *
More information about the scn
mailing list