SCN: Re: Purposes--and spam.

[emailer1]

This excellent idea should be pursued.  What about starting a separate
committee to focus on this.

----- Original Message -----
From: J. Johnson <jj at scn.org>
To: <scn at scn.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 1:14 AM
Subject: SCN: Purposes--and spam.


> I have wondered if a useful and highly laudable purpose SCN might follow
> would be the fighting of spam.  I don't mean by the usual technical means.
> I mean by legal and political means.
>
> Consider that Washington state does have a law that assesses a penalty of
> $500 for e-mail messages with false header lines.  There have even been
> two or three cases reported in the papers where individuals have
> collected.
>
> Now consider how many messages we have coming through here that have false
> headers--lots! (Thousands.)  (Did I mention a possible revenue stream?)
>
> For sure there is some work involved.  Like researching the law, learning
> how to layout a case before a judge (small claims courts, very informal),
> filing a case, and perhaps even writing letters to the spammers that we
> are about to file a hundred or so individual claims and would they like to
> negotiate a bulk discount?
>
> Nor would this work in all cases--there still are those spammers from out
> of country.  But there are enough native spammers to keep provide a good
> business.
>
> (There's also the research getting the spammer's name and address, but
> that is not insolvable.  Just ask them where to send the check.)
>
> There's also possible political action, like lobbying our legislators.
> Well, maybe our Articles forbid lobbying, but we could sure _educate_
> them.  Or educate our users how to file suits.
>
> SCN would be a good base--perhaps the ideal base--for doing this because:
> first, we have access a large flow of spam, and the technical expertise to
> analyze it; second, because the organization can provide the support
> for doing this that individuals don't have; and third, because this is not
> something most business are inclinded to undertake.  (Or even governmental
> agencies.)
>
> And it isn't hard to start.  A start could be just doing some research
> about spam and putting up a web site.
>
> So should SCN undertake active legal, political, or other measures to
> fight spam?
>
> === JJ =============================================================
>
>
>
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * *  From the Listowner  * * * * * * * * * * * *
> . To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to:
> majordomo at scn.org In the body of the message, type:
> unsubscribe scn
> ==== Messages posted on this list are also available on the web at: ====
> * * * * * * *     http://www.scn.org/volunteers/scn-l/     * * * * * * *
>

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *  From the Listowner  * * * * * * * * * * * *
.	To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to:
majordomo at scn.org		In the body of the message, type:
unsubscribe scn
==== Messages posted on this list are also available on the web at: ====
* * * * * * *     http://www.scn.org/volunteers/scn-l/     * * * * * * *