SCN: SCNA general meeting 6/9.

[J. Johnson]

On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Randy Groves wrote:

> No argument whatsoever that the annual meeting is way overdue.  Okay - so
> it is.  What are we going to do about it?

Duh, I don't know.  Hold a meeting?  (What a novel suggestion!)

Isn't this EXACTLY WHAT WE HAVE BEEN ASKING? FOR EIGHT YEARS?

And why is this mention of a plan to hold a meeting coming coming from
you, and not from any of the putative Board members?  I say it is because
they are incapable of doing it themselves.  (Or unwilling.) I say they are
missing in action, and that a necessary condition for revitalizing SCNA is
to DUMP this Board. 

Of course, that does lead to the question of who is to replace them.  (A
point that has ham-strung us before.) That is a matter that cannot be
resolved "at a meeting".  It needs to be hammered out before hand.  

Like various other issues, such as: who are the members? It was reported
at the 6/9 meeting that there are "about ten".  (Who are they?) Strictly
speaking, _they_ can have a meeting, as _they_ are the "owners; the rest
of us are just bystanders, without legal standing.  If the rest of us want
to change this, how do we do it?  Have the Board, as a final act of
contrition, annoint a bunch of us as members?  What is the plan? 

There are a number of issues that would be best worked out before any
meeting.  And this list would be a fine place to start the discussions.
(Plural, because several discussions are needed.)

=== JJohnson =====================================================

* * * * * * * *  From the Listowner  * * * * * * * *
To unsubscribe send a message to:  majordomo at scn.org
In the body of the message, type:  unsubscribe scn