SCN: scn2 list or this one?

[jmabel]

Yes, it sounds reasonable. And, as I've said already, it seems to me to make
more sense to use the exisiting list, because it's hard for me to imagine that
anyone interested in the future/survival of SCN/SCNA would not want to at least
observe this discussion, and equally hard to imagine why anyone *not* interested
in that would be on scn at scn.org.

--------------------
Joe Mabel

On Thu, 21 Jun 2012, Randy Groves wrote:

> You should have all received an invitation to join a new list called scn2.
> The intent of creating a new list was to give all of those on this list a
> chance to opt in to a new discussion.  And it was also a vehicle to include
> folks who aren't presently on the scn list (for whatever reason).  Also -
> the scn2 list is being run on Mailman, which is more dependable, on a
> different machine than, and has better mail list management software than
> the scn list on Majordomo.
>
> But as Joe Mabel noted - why not just use the scn list?
>
> Fair enough - the other options would have been to canvas this list and get
> a vote, or just start using this list, and too bad for the folks who don't
> want to participate.  I don't like the second option, but the first
> certainly has merit.
>
> So - who on this list thinks that whatever discussions and planning we have
> about the future of SCN/SCNA should be held on this list?  Please let me
> know by next Thursday (the28th).  If we have a majority that think this is
> the venue, I'll invite those that requested to be on a new list to the scn
> list.
>
> Does this sound like a reasonable course of action?
>
> -randy
>
* * * * * * * *  From the Listowner  * * * * * * * *
To unsubscribe send a message to:  majordomo at scn.org
In the body of the message, type:  unsubscribe scn