SCN: scn2 list or this one?

[Victor Eskenazi]

i'm confused as to which list is "this" list or "that" list or list list...

i'd say that everyone that is a scn member and/or has an scn account/email
has a stake - invite everyone - to opt in . . . "postage" is cheap!

v

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Doug Schuler <
douglas at publicsphereproject.org> wrote:

>
> I think that Joe's right. Let's use the existing list.
>
> What I'd like to see is a brief report on the meeting sent to everybody
> who
> was invited to the meeting in the first place.
>
> That way the invitees would get some information about the project. They'd
> get a little closure on the fact that we actually had a meeting and that
> there
> is a feeling that we can move forward.
>
> I think the note should also extend an invitation to everybody to join the
> scn list so they could hear about what ideas we have and how they
> could participate more if they choose to.
>
> It also should contain information on how one becomes an SCN member.
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Jun 21, 2012, at 8:54 AM, jmabel wrote:
>
> Yes, it sounds reasonable. And, as I've said already, it seems to me to
> make
> more sense to use the exisiting list, because it's hard for me to imagine
> that
> anyone interested in the future/survival of SCN/SCNA would not want to at
> least
> observe this discussion, and equally hard to imagine why anyone *not*
> interested
> in that would be on scn at scn.org.
>
> --------------------
> Joe Mabel
>
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2012, Randy Groves wrote:
>
> You should have all received an invitation to join a new list called scn2.
>
> The intent of creating a new list was to give all of those on this list a
>
> chance to opt in to a new discussion.  And it was also a vehicle to include
>
> folks who aren't presently on the scn list (for whatever reason).  Also -
>
> the scn2 list is being run on Mailman, which is more dependable, on a
>
> different machine than, and has better mail list management software than
>
> the scn list on Majordomo.
>
>
> But as Joe Mabel noted - why not just use the scn list?
>
>
> Fair enough - the other options would have been to canvas this list and get
>
> a vote, or just start using this list, and too bad for the folks who don't
>
> want to participate.  I don't like the second option, but the first
>
> certainly has merit.
>
>
> So - who on this list thinks that whatever discussions and planning we have
>
> about the future of SCN/SCNA should be held on this list?  Please let me
>
> know by next Thursday (the28th).  If we have a majority that think this is
>
> the venue, I'll invite those that requested to be on a new list to the scn
>
> list.
>
>
> Does this sound like a reasonable course of action?
>
>
> -randy
>
>
> * * * * * * * *  From the Listowner  * * * * * * * *
> To unsubscribe send a message to:  majordomo at scn.org
> In the body of the message, type:  unsubscribe scn
>
>
>  Douglas Schuler
> douglas at publicsphereproject.org
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> What  Kind of an Activist Are YOU? Play Activist Mirror and find out!
>      http://apps.facebook.com/activist-mirror/
>
> Public Sphere Project
>      http://www.publicsphereproject.org/
>
> Liberating Voices!  A Pattern Language for Communication Revolution
> (project)
>      http://www.publicsphereproject.org/patterns/
>
> Liberating Voices!  A Pattern Language for Communication Revolution (book)
>      http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?ttype=2&tid=11601
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.scn.org/pipermail/scn/attachments/20120621/c6b25e3f/attachment.html>