SCN: scn2 list or this one?

[Randy Groves]

So you're saying send out a report to all the users of SCN?  That's who was
invited.  Not saying that we should or shouldn't, but just be aware that
sending to all the users of SCN takes a day or more - if we do it in a way
that doesn't bring the system to its knees.

-randy

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Doug Schuler <
douglas at publicsphereproject.org> wrote:

>
> I think that Joe's right. Let's use the existing list.
>
> What I'd like to see is a brief report on the meeting sent to everybody
> who
> was invited to the meeting in the first place.
>
> That way the invitees would get some information about the project. They'd
> get a little closure on the fact that we actually had a meeting and that
> there
> is a feeling that we can move forward.
>
> I think the note should also extend an invitation to everybody to join the
> scn list so they could hear about what ideas we have and how they
> could participate more if they choose to.
>
> It also should contain information on how one becomes an SCN member.
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Jun 21, 2012, at 8:54 AM, jmabel wrote:
>
> Yes, it sounds reasonable. And, as I've said already, it seems to me to
> make
> more sense to use the exisiting list, because it's hard for me to imagine
> that
> anyone interested in the future/survival of SCN/SCNA would not want to at
> least
> observe this discussion, and equally hard to imagine why anyone *not*
> interested
> in that would be on scn at scn.org.
>
> --------------------
> Joe Mabel
>
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2012, Randy Groves wrote:
>
> You should have all received an invitation to join a new list called scn2.
>
> The intent of creating a new list was to give all of those on this list a
>
> chance to opt in to a new discussion.  And it was also a vehicle to include
>
> folks who aren't presently on the scn list (for whatever reason).  Also -
>
> the scn2 list is being run on Mailman, which is more dependable, on a
>
> different machine than, and has better mail list management software than
>
> the scn list on Majordomo.
>
>
> But as Joe Mabel noted - why not just use the scn list?
>
>
> Fair enough - the other options would have been to canvas this list and get
>
> a vote, or just start using this list, and too bad for the folks who don't
>
> want to participate.  I don't like the second option, but the first
>
> certainly has merit.
>
>
> So - who on this list thinks that whatever discussions and planning we have
>
> about the future of SCN/SCNA should be held on this list?  Please let me
>
> know by next Thursday (the28th).  If we have a majority that think this is
>
> the venue, I'll invite those that requested to be on a new list to the scn
>
> list.
>
>
> Does this sound like a reasonable course of action?
>
>
> -randy
>
>
> * * * * * * * *  From the Listowner  * * * * * * * *
> To unsubscribe send a message to:  majordomo at scn.org
> In the body of the message, type:  unsubscribe scn
>
>
> Douglas Schuler
> douglas at publicsphereproject.org
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> What  Kind of an Activist Are YOU? Play Activist Mirror and find out!
>      http://apps.facebook.com/activist-mirror/
>
> Public Sphere Project
>      http://www.publicsphereproject.org/
>
> Liberating Voices!  A Pattern Language for Communication Revolution
> (project)
>      http://www.publicsphereproject.org/patterns/
>
> Liberating Voices!  A Pattern Language for Communication Revolution (book)
>      http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?ttype=2&tid=11601
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.scn.org/pipermail/scn/attachments/20120621/96158355/attachment.html>